Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

    • Beijing says the economy grew by 5.2% in the three months to the end of June, compared to the same time last year.View the full article
    • Hi Can you put post up in PDF redacted your full Tenancy Agreement we need to see it all not just those clause As for the Estate Agency stating your Rent and Deposit is paying for the Redecoration of the property is wrong as this was there and the Landlords responsibility to claim those cost back from the Previous Tenants from either their Rents or Tenancy Deposit therefore the Redecoration cost is the Landlords Problem not not yours nor your Rent or Tenancy Deposit (until end of Tenancy) I would be writing to the Estate Agency asking further to your telephone conversation with XXXXXXXXX  on XX/XX/2025 you require Clarification as it was stated by your employee that I would not receive any rent nor deposit back as compensation as the Landlord was using this to Redecorate the Property. Neither my Rent nor Deposit should be used to Redecorate this Property due to the Previous Tenants as this should have been claimed back from the previous Tenants via either there Rents or Tenancy Deposit. Further to this I collected the keys as agreed on the 5th July 2025 to move into this Property with no mention at all from your Estate Agency that due to all the Redecoration ongoing when I went to that Property on that date I was not able to move into the Property as Agreed in me Agreement. You have then move my moving in date to 11th July 2025 therefore my Rent payments should commence from 11th July 2025 and I require confirmation from PPM Estate Agency and if refuse this full clarification as to why and what Housing Legislation and clauses from my Agreement. DO NOT PHONE and ask this unless you can record the call Send it by email but also follow it up in writing and get free proof of posting from the Post Office
    • Heat pump makers are ready to raise output, but demand is still sluggish.View the full article
    • The deal is part of the Trump administration's push for more aggressive adoption of artificial intelligence in the government.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Recommended Posts

Dear All,

 

First of all, I just joined the consumer action group so a big HELLO to all of you that are reading this.

 

I have a problem with a web-based company named "parcel2go.com", a UK based international courier services.I placed the order (a parcel to be sent to Spain), all fine, as it was the other time I used their service this very same year. They collected the parcel at the agreed date (DHL did the collection). A week later they returned my parcel giving no reason why they were returning it. I have already left the UK and my friend (collection address) tells me that it was returned and not reason why given. No one contacted me from parcel2go.com. I wrote them an e-mail asking was what wrong and why they returned the parcel.

 

First answer from parcel2go: The parcel was held from the 26th until the 2nd with no contact made regarding this parcel therefore it was returned.

 

Still didn't understand what he meant by "no contact made regarding this parcel" so asked again. Their answer: Whilst the order was in transit we do require the customers to track their own parcels and if they have any problems then to contact us and we can resolve them. Unfortunately on this case the parcel was held and no contact made regarding this and therefore the parcel has been returned to the sending address.

 

Because I used their service before I knew that the customers are not required to track their own parcel, this is a customer's choice. So I asked again why this time customers are required to track their own parcels and that I need a solutions since I paid for a service that was not delivered

Their answer: I am afraid you will need to pay again as the parcel was held and we do require all parcels to be tracked by our customers and that is why we provide tracking facilities with all our services. It is stated in our terms and conditions that you have agreed to and it does also state that the courier will only hold for a reasonable amount of time before returning to sender

I went over the terms and conditions and there is no such thing stated in the T&C. I start noticing that it wasn't my fault but theirs (between parcel2go and DHL) that the parcel was not delivered. I wrote them back referring that not such thing was stated under the T&C and that I need a solution and that I wasn't going to pay for a service that I have already paid, asking for solutions again.

Their answer: Unfortunately, under the circumstances we cannot send this parcel for free as we have been charged for the sending of the parcel and also the return of the parcel. The parcel was held and I do have it that the address was incomplete. You are also advised in the collection e-mail below to track your parcel and given a link to be able to do this.

So the person replying obviously contradicting himself (and finding excuses) first saying that customers were required to track their own parcel and then he comes saying that I was advised in the collection e-mail to track the parcel. I cut&paste what that collection e-mail says: You can track this parcel by going to XXXX and the thing about the address that was incomplete is not true because the it wouldn't be possible to place an order if all required fields are not filled, obviously the delivery address was complete, so another excuse.

 

So what shall I do now? Obviously not paying again placing another order and paying twice for their service since is not my fault but theirs that the parcel was not delivered, but seemingly they are not willing to take any responsibility.

 

Can anyone give me advice on this issue?

Many thanks in advance

Oier

Edited by jonni2bad
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...