Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Recommended Posts

Hello

I have a loan with Lloyds TSB which was taken out in 2004. The purpose of the loan was to get some additional funds needed to clear a credit card. Lloyds basically closed my old loan and refinanced it to cover the new amount.

 

I want to challenge the PPI on both the new and the old loan as I believe that it was mis-sold (not being told I could buy it elsewhere, the fact that I had life cover and sickness cover with my new job and being told that it would help my application if I took the cover as I was less of a risk this way.)

 

I raised this with Lloyds fairly early on but was outside the 30 day period. I later got into financial difficulties which led to a DMP being started up in 2006 prior to which I had tried to refinance the loan without PPI (which would have saved me £75/mth) but was refused on grounds of credit rating.

 

How do I go about challenging both loans? Can I do it one one claim? Both were done in branch and the form was filled in for me and all I did was sign it. You can clearly see that the crosses marked to indicate acceptance of the PPI are not my writing but I don't know if this has any bearing or not.

 

Any advice appreciated as always :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello money worries,

 

Without knowing the full history of your post It is difficult to give you a cast iron answer, however I have been in similar position with Direct Line Financial Services 4 loans and RBS 3 loans. Mostly refinanced from one loan to another and all with PPI.

 

May I suggest a look at my extremely long thread, ( I have had one hell of a fight and went through the Financial Ombudsman Service which for me seems to have worked two out of three complaints have been agreed by the adjudicator with one pending. No settlement yet but it looks good for the new year.

 

Please see this thread and if you can use any of the letters, complaints etc please feel free to cobble them for your own particular case.;)

 

alanalana PPI claim against RBS (looking for some help) please

 

aa

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

moneyworries I have made multiple claims with Lloyds. There were two very distinct type of misselling but I did make one claim that basically covered 4 loans which were part of a string of refinancing and that was pne complaitn the very different one was a second claim.

 

I went through their complaints procedure first and now am going through FOS as their responses were unbelievably poor

If you can keep you head when all of those around you are losing theirs try parking your helicopter somewhere else

 

 

The PPI Saga

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Any thoughts appreciated on this one please!!! I have a loan with Lloyds which unfortunately due to financial difficulties is now covered by a debt management plan. All is well with the DMP and Lloyds recently made me an offer for an early settlement.

 

However, prior to this I CCA'd and corresponded with LTSB regarding the PPI on the loan which I believe was mis-sold (basically I was told that it would help my application, no-one told me that other options were available or that the sickness/life cover I had with my employer would assist in the event of illness/death).

 

Lloyds sent a reply to the CCA which all looks perfectly valid but they have never responded to the letters I sent asking for a response concerning the PPI. As I am in a DMP the PPI is not even valid but the T&C's say I am not entitled to a refund on the remaining premium in these circumstances.

 

Basically the loan was for £24k and there is approx £6.5k of PPI added to that so although I am happy to settle early, my aim is to try and get Lloyds to lower their settlement offer to account for the fact that the PPI was mis-sold. Is there a way I can get them to reply or do I just keep sending letters?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Long story short, I have a DMP with Payplan who are managing my debts. One is with Lloyds for a £29k loan which includes £7k worth of PPI. I challenged them on missold which they disputed (I cannot categorically prove them otherwise unfortunately so I won't go into it). They have basically offered to refund half but are insisting that if I accept it, it will be used to pay off some of the arrears on my loan - is this allowed?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Long story short, I have a DMP with Payplan who are managing my debts. One is with Lloyds for a £29k loan which includes £7k worth of PPI. I challenged them on missold which they disputed (I cannot categorically prove them otherwise unfortunately so I won't go into it). They have basically offered to refund half but are insisting that if I accept it, it will be used to pay off some of the arrears on my loan - is this allowed?!

 

I believe they can use any recredited PPI to pay off arrears on a loan. However you could put up a fight and say if the PPI had not been added - mis-sold then you may have been able to keep up the payments on the loan. You can also argue that a loan amount and a PPI amount are two separate contracts and therefore they should not use the PPI refund to pay off any outstanding amount on the loan.

 

You should also use the fact that you have been prepared to try and resolve the issues through a DMP

 

Have a look at these forums for more information..

 

Debt Collection Industry

Legal Issues

 

hope this helps

 

aa

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...