Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

    • Appreciate your swift input and amendments! I've reworded some of it (and will likely reformat the page a bit before printing to make it neater) but I've included the majority of your suggestions. Let me know what you think. Would you recommend I email this to the individual who declined the compensation as well as sending it by post? Cheers Switch2 - Letter of Claim v3.pdf
    • I suggest (change in red) -   The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4.  The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1.  The Defendant is the recorded keeper of [car reg no]. 2.  It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3.  As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance.  The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner.  Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim.    4.  In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5.  The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer.  6. The Claimant is claiming an unlawful amount of interest.  The dispute between the parties concerns a disputed, unpaid invoice, issued on 6 January 2025, on which it is written "Payment to be made by 06-Feb-2025".  Yet the Claimant is claiming interest from 4 January 2025.  7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety.  It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.
    • Okay. That sounds a lot better. Hopefully you now realise that the third party rights act only applies if you have used a parcel broker but you are trying to sue the courier company directly. So because you contracted directly with the courier, you are going to sue them directly. By using insurance or prohibited items or non-compensation lists, they are seeking to exclude or limit liability for failure to exercise reasonable skill and care – and of course this is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act and in fact the insurance that they pressurise you to purchase amounts to a secondary contract under section 72 of the Act because it is a prohibited secondary contract which is attempting also to limit or exclude liability for failure to exercise reasonable skill and care. The prohibited items list is an unfair term as you have already pointed out. Even more significantly here not only are they saying that it is prohibited – but they are saying this despite the fact that they were very happy to take your money in respect of insurance. These people are stupid and dishonest. But also now they will abuse the County Court system by making you jump through the hoops because it costs them scarcely anything at all to use up the County Court system because it is a publicly funded taxpayer resourced system of justice. They don't use this to obtain justice. They use this simply as a means of debt avoidance to try and frustrate their customers legitimate claims.   Okay I've made a few amendments – and also I've added a further head of damage for unfair trading which could give you a next your little bit of money and also an extra little bit of leverage. Please have a look. See if you are happy with it. If you want to take anything away. If you want to add anything. If there is anything which is incorrect – and post up the final draft here please for a last look.
    • Nope, not yet filed, have it in draft but was going to leave it a little while until nearer the deadline 🙂
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Recommended Posts

I had a case for a dispute against the charges from one of the companies that I asked for a survey on some property that I own. They did a poor job and they expected full payment. The case went to court and I was asked to pay £556.79 against the debt and £157 for costs.

 

The problem was that the letter from the Manchester County Court came when I was away (I travel a lot and for long periods) and wasn't here to sort it out. So it went to High Court Enforcement Group Ltd for collection.

 

Their initial notice from HCE was for an amount of £1222.14 which was explained as:

 

The Judgement Debt = £713.79

Judgement costs including statutory fees = £508.35

 

The story went on but I would like to ask if these costs can be justified on the basis of the first visit of the enforcement officer.

 

Babis

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I am sorry but I forgot to add that I am a new member to this group and this is my first case with bailiffs. I have read the fees in Schedule 7 and I understand they can charge mileage (£25), a percentage of the amount recovered (2.5% of £713) and a valuation fee (0.4% of the property - in my case was my car worth probably ~£4000). Can they charge for anything else? Please advice or point to relevant information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi babist

 

Heres a link to the cerified bailifs fees and how they charge.

Its probably not all your looking for but it will give you food for thought. Another member will be along to fill in the gaps:D

 

Best of luck !

 

Fwog

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Fwog!

 

I hope that someone can help because the case is rather complicated for me to understand what they are allowed to charge.

 

There was no explanation of the costs incurred and when I asked him he said "Pay first and then I will explain the charges".

 

I have now paid fully the debt and they have sent me a breakdown of the charges which I find incomprehensible. They include items such:

 

execution fee (£101.75)

Poundage, Fee Order 1 (£27)

Inventory Fee, Order 6(2) (b) and Valuation Fee (£71)

Financial Management Fee, Order 12 (£146.87)

Administration Fee, Order 12 (£117.50)

Officer's re-attendance's charges (£695 - three times including first time ~£230 each notice).

 

I was also asked to pay £11.75 cheque charge and 4% credit card charge.

 

I have asked them for a detailed breakdown of the charges and also did a SAR. I have also written to Manchester County Court under FOI to get info on what charges they have agreed with their bailiffs. I have also checked and the specific individual is approved by Caernarfon County Court.

 

I am just annoyed with the attitude of the specific individual because he did not provide an explanation of the charges until after I paid and also the explanation was summarised under headings and not explained. At some stage, he also asked for this request in writing and claimed that he didn't receive my letter or my message to his answerphone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi babist,

 

Have been having a scout about re these charges and I've deduced the following.. (MY opinion only - am more than willing to be put right BTW)...

 

Your county court judgement has been escalated to High Court by the claimant (which can be done for any monies over £600), which means the HCEO has different powers and fees to your 'normal' county court bailiff. In an ideal world you would have applied to have the judgement set aside at county court stage re not receiving the paperwork, but no point on dwelling on that now.

 

There is a schedule of fees known as The High Court Enforcement Officers Regulations 2004 - found at

 

The High Court Enforcement Officers Regulations 2004

 

Reading through the above, my reading on what tey should have charged is as follows... (I've put in brackets the relevant sections I've used to see if people agree with my logic)

 

The Execution Fee (1 a&b) = £5 for the first £100, then 2.5% for the remaining (which by my calcultions means they should have charged £20.34)

 

The Poundage Fee (5.1) is charged @ £3.00 per day, so I'm guessing it took 9 days to get this sorted;

 

The Inventory Fee & Valuation Fee (2 b) is charged @ 5% of the value of the goods levied. You mentioned your car is worth £4000, but unfortunately when it comes to bailiffs, only their values work, eg when seizing goods, the cheaper the better, when charging a % for fees, the higher the better!;

 

The Financial Management Fee & Admin Fee (12) - comes under 'Miscellaneous'!

 

I can't see anything that allows for an Attendance Fee. I've read elsewhere that claimants are charged c £60 to instruct a HCEO to attend, and this covers for up to 3 visits. so where the £230+ figure per visit comes from beats me.

 

That's my reading of it anyway. But it's only what I've gathered from searching around.

 

Your best bet is to hope Tomtubby stops by - she will have the definitive answers to your questions.

 

KJD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks KJD,

 

some additional information. They are claiming and I quote "fees are charged under The Courts Act 2004, governed by Schedule 3, Regulation 13 and Poundage is charged under Fee A1, Schedule 3 of HCEO Regulations 2004."

 

I cannot locate any Courts Act 2004. Anyone has any ideas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

We really need Tomtubby here...

 

The charges are listed under Regulation 13, Schedule 3 of the The High Court Enforcement Officers Regulations 2004 (takes a bit of reading of that link I gave, but it is in there). I think they've given you the wrong act though, as the Court Act 2004, from what I can find, is an Irish act to do with personal injury litigation??

 

The poundage is in the above also, but under a different section number.

 

But hey, what's a few mistakes when they're taking your money off you :mad:

 

I'd be really interested to see what you get back re the Freedom of Information request you've made. Under Miscellaneous (12), it says they can charge what they like - "For any matter not otherwise provided for, such sum as a Master, district judge or costs judge may allow upon application". So they can charge a 'Financial Management' and 'Admin Fee'?

 

Which prompts me to ask.. the Admin Fee @ £117.50 which is £100 plus VAT at the old rate. Did you pay this before 1st December 2008? Have they listed any VAT charges on the breakdown? If aso, is there a VAT number on the receipt you were given? The above Act does say "Value Added Tax, if payable, may be added to the fees specified". So who says if they are payable?

 

And another thing, I've not personally heard of a cheque charge - there's an ongoing debate on here re charging for using a credit card. Again, Tomtubby has stated they can't charge it but they do.

 

Just my rambling thoughts on this...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will wait for Tomtubby to drop by then!!

 

I found the information on this forum extremely useful so I will be more than happy to add my bit here. So when i get the FOI request back, I will update you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an addition to this..

 

I have checked some paperwork here at work which I've received from a County Court (unfortunately had to take a customer to court) and have been looking specifically for Shefiff's officer's fees. There is a paragraph in leaflet Ex 345 'About Bailiff's and Sheriff's Officers' which reads as follows -

 

"How do I complain about the fees I have been charged?

 

If you think that the fees charged by the sheriff's officers are too high, you can apply to the High Court for a detailed assessment of the fees.

This means the court will decide if the fees you have been charged are reasonable or not.

 

Bailiffs..blah..blah..

 

You will need to pay an application fee to have the bailiff's fees assessed.

 

Etc.."

 

It then goes on to detail about making a complaint about a sheriff's officer, but personally I would think very carefully about going down that route. We've already had a poster come a cropper for following rather rash advice given to him re complaints.

 

I can't seem to get on the HMCS website at the moment to look for further info for the Assessment of Fees process (guidance notes, application form, etc) so you should have a look on there later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks KJD.

 

At this stage, I am trying to understand what they are allowed to charge. I hope to find out this information from the SAR and the FOI requests. Fingers crossed....

 

As I mentioned before, the main problem for me, is that this individual refused to provide information on the charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Guest Thebailiff

I am an assistant high court enforcement officer and you have been lucky so far. We could charge up to 400+vat for attending. Also:

 

execution fee (£101.75) (cost of transfer to high court and handling of original documents)

Poundage, Fee Order 1 (£27) (percentage of debt paid dircet to the nominated HCEO

Inventory Fee, Order 6(2) (b) and Valuation Fee (£71) nothing to do with any goods levied and just a basic flat rate inv fee for siezure and valuation costs that we have to pay (or time it takes us).

Financial Management Fee, Order 12 (£146.87) (As HCEO and AHCEO we can, will and do give debt managment advice.)

Administration Fee, Order 12 (£117.50) (because there are lots of people working behind the scenes on each case)

Officer's re-attendance's charges (£695 - three times including first time ~£230 each notice). Could charge up too £400 per hour for attendances. i have seen a case where £12000 (yes, that number is right) in fee's have been added to a business's debt. the business questioned it and took a HCE company to court and lost. the fee's were fair.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Thebailiff
Remember, the HCEO cannot take goods that do not belong to the defendant.

 

So if you've already sold everything.............

 

we can remove any goods we find on the spot from the directed address and if there is no 3rd party claim recieved within 5 day (just 5 days, not 5 working days) then we are entitled to sell the goods at auction and to keep the proceeds after 14 days if no further 3rd party claims are made. If 3rd party claim is made after 5 days but before 14, we will return moneies made from sale of good minus our cost and the auctioneers costs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Happy Contrails
If 3rd party claim is made after 5 days but before 14, we will return moneies made from sale of good minus our cost and the auctioneers costs.

 

Very similar situation happened to me a few years back. A bailiff charged a fee for levying on my goods including a grand piano for my partners parking ticket. I took the issuing council to court and won. The judge commented in his findings a bailiff loses entitlement to deem prima-facie the goods belong to the debtor after being told they belong to someone else. No statutory declaration or affidavit was needed.

 

Is your above-comment based on any particular legislation, or just a bailiff's code of practice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Thebailiff
Very similar situation happened to me a few years back. A bailiff charged a fee for levying on my goods including a grand piano for my partners parking ticket. I took the issuing council to court and won. The judge commented in his findings a bailiff loses entitlement to deem prima-facie the goods belong to the debtor after being told they belong to someone else. No statutory declaration or affidavit was needed.

 

Is your above-comment based on any particular legislation, or just a bailiff's code of practice?

 

Ok first question. were you dealing with bailiff's or high court enforcement officers. Completely different laws for each side.

 

And with reagards to high court enforcement, the rules are set out by the lord high chancellor and so are law and NOT our code of practice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Happy Contrails

A certificated bailiff, but trading with an expired certifiicate (but not relevant in this aspect of the case).

 

Are the lord high chancellor rules and fees for HCEO's freely available to the public? and if so where?

 

I find it somewhat odd a bailiff can still retain his auction fee after discovering the disposed property did not belong to the debtor. Your post indicates a bailiff and can subvert the general rule of prima-facie to obtain a money transfer and I couldn't find anything to confirm that position in the High Court Enforcement Officers Regulations 2004

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Thebailiff
hi thebailiff i was just wondering how long have you been an assistant high court enforcement officer.

 

getgoing:)

 

3+ years now

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Thebailiff
A certificated bailiff, but trading with an expired certifiicate (but not relevant in this aspect of the case).

 

Are the lord high chancellor rules and fees for HCEO's freely available to the public? and if so where?

 

I find it somewhat odd a bailiff can still retain his auction fee after discovering the disposed property did not belong to the debtor. Your post indicates a bailiff and can subvert the general rule of prima-facie to obtain a money transfer and I couldn't find anything to confirm that position in the High Court Enforcement Officers Regulations 2004

 

I have recently taken my AHCEO refresher course again which is regulated by the lord chancellor and the HCEOA and the exam stated thos facts clearly.

 

The only fee's we charge if we are returning goods is the auctioneers cost and removal costs(not our removal cost, but costs to pay outside contractor) If the debtor fails to inform us that the goods dont belong to him that is not our fault, and the person who the goods do belong to would have to get his money back from the debtor either by asking or going through the small claims court.

 

It is hard to find the regulations and i agree with you on that. Its why im here. to try and clear up some of the myth that surrounds this. all the fee's except attendance fee's are laid out here The High Court Enforcement Officers Regulations 2004.

 

our attendance fee's (i spoke boss today to confirm this) are not set out by law. we have no ceiling on what we can charge like normal bailiffs. the lord chancellor sets a guide of £300max for residential and £400 for commercial, however these are not enforced for HCEO and therefore we can charge anything. (but our company policy as well as all those governed by the HCEOA are to abide by the fee's as sugested by the L/chancellor). I have not met one enforcement officer that will go above those charges except on an hourly rate after arriving on site.

 

We also regularily lower our charges if the debtor askes and he is prepaired to make paymentsif he way to make a £500 payment and i have just charged 200+ to attend and he was worried about the high charges, i would have no qualms with dropping my charges to 50+ just so he did not get into deeper trouble. Remember, we are here to get the claimants money back but we are also tasked with helping debtors to sort out their debt. not make it worse.

 

Let me ask you, if you were in my place, how much would you cahrge if you had to drive 2 hours to see a debtor because he had defaulted on his aggreement.£50? would not even cover my wages for that 4 hour round trip. £100? might just cover my fuel and wages for the 4 hour round trip, but the company makes no money. is £200 too accesive now? (thats a question, not a statement)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Happy Contrails
Let me ask you, if you were in my place, how much would you cahrge if you had to drive 2 hours to see a debtor because he had defaulted on his aggreement.£50?

 

Charge the fee set by legislation. Anything more and I could be criminally liable under Section 2 of the Fraud Act leaving me without a job.

 

Nobody forced you to be a bailiff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am an assistant high court enforcement officer and you have been lucky so far. We could charge up to 400+vat for attending. Also:

 

execution fee (£101.75) (cost of transfer to high court and handling of original documents)

Poundage, Fee Order 1 (£27) (percentage of debt paid dircet to the nominated HCEO

Inventory Fee, Order 6(2) (b) and Valuation Fee (£71) nothing to do with any goods levied and just a basic flat rate inv fee for siezure and valuation costs that we have to pay (or time it takes us).

Financial Management Fee, Order 12 (£146.87) (As HCEO and AHCEO we can, will and do give debt managment advice.)

Administration Fee, Order 12 (£117.50) (because there are lots of people working behind the scenes on each case)

Officer's re-attendance's charges (£695 - three times including first time ~£230 each notice). Could charge up too £400 per hour for attendances. i have seen a case where £12000 (yes, that number is right) in fee's have been added to a business's debt. the business questioned it and took a HCE company to court and lost. the fee's were fair.

 

Hi Bailiff

 

thanks for your response.

 

Can I ask whether a HCEO is required to provide the information for the fees at each visit and if asked, in an itemised form?

 

Also, is there a scale of fees for HCEOs? I mena the extra fees such as administration fees, re-attendance fees, etc

 

Also, who decides to transfer a county court judgment to the High Court? Who pays for it? Is it the creditor or the HCEO?

 

Finally, is it possible for a certificated bailiff to act on behalf of a HCEO in a county court judgment transferred to the High Court?

 

I appreciate your input since you are doing the job of a bailiff. I believe that bailiffs and HCEO are entitled to receive payment for services provided as long as the fees are justified.

 

Babist

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Thebailiff
Hi Bailiff

 

thanks for your response.

 

Can I ask whether a HCEO is required to provide the information for the fees at each visit and if asked, in an itemised form?

 

Also, is there a scale of fees for HCEOs? I mena the extra fees such as administration fees, re-attendance fees, etc

 

Also, who decides to transfer a county court judgment to the High Court? Who pays for it? Is it the creditor or the HCEO?

 

Finally, is it possible for a certificated bailiff to act on behalf of a HCEO in a county court judgment transferred to the High Court?

 

I appreciate your input since you are doing the job of a bailiff. I believe that bailiffs and HCEO are entitled to receive payment for services provided as long as the fees are justified.

 

Babist

 

Hi Babist

 

no. there is no requirment to supply that information on the doorstewp unless your are levying goods and then its a very basic breakdown and goes into no detail. Our offices will supply a breakdown of costs at no charge.

 

The scale of fee's can be found here The High Court Enforcement Officers Regulations 2004

 

The creditor decides to transfer a case to high court. He sends payment for the transfer along with the CCJ and its sent to the high court for a look over to make sure its correct and within the limits to be able to transfer it and if it is they stamp it with the high court seal and send it back. the creditor decides which company of HCEO's to use and also which particular HCEO to use.

 

I am a certificated bailiff but it means nothing as a higher qualification exam is required to gain the approval to act as an AHCEO. usually a days intense training followed by a written exam the next day. (it not as easy as it sounds as we have to learn about bankruptcy, iva, winding up, fee's, costs and a host of other information)

 

Yes, i agree, I think we are entitled to payment and i fully agree that our fee's have to be kept low and not willy nilly charges making life worse for a debtor. but sometimes it takes a shock of high charges to make a debtor realise there are serious consiquinces sometimes. Usually these are reduced if he see's sense.(not calling debtors dumb by any means, just saying they should not bury their heads in the sand as that makes life worse) But on the whole our charges are reasonable and no one has yet won a case against us on those grounds becasue we are closely regulated. (although it may not seem like it)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...