Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Recommended Posts

Afternoon,

 

This morning my girlfriend has received a letter from BCW regarding a claim for £1xx relating to Talk Talk.

 

This has come as quite a shock for a couple of reasons:

 

1) The address that she has received the letter, is her previous address, that she had to leave due to harassment/violence (not a nice area)

 

2) She cancelled all accounts (gas/electric, Virginmedia & Talk Talk) the day that she was given the keys to her new place, informed them that all Direct Debits will be cancelled, and paid any outstanding accounts there and then.

 

3) None of these companies were given the new address due to the risk of being tracked down again by the people that were causing all the probs..

 

Can you please help me, as Im slightly stumped as to

How they got her new address (the old address is a flat of which a number of the flats are now boarded up inc her old one).

 

BCW are threating doorstep collection, despite informing them that the accounts were cleared when direct debit was cancelled.

Can we do anything, like a letter requesting only contact via post/No doorstop collection (id there any law relating to this?)

 

Should there be a written signed agreement from talk talk?

 

Any help on this will be greatly appreciated.

 

Ta

 

Andi

Link to post
Share on other sites

Afternoon and welcome. A quick letter to BCW should deal with the "doorstep" thing, as below:

 

Dear Sir/ Madam

 

 

ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE

 

 

I note from your letter that you intend to arrange a "doorstep call". Please be advised that under OFT rules you can only visit me at my home if you make an appointment and I DO NOT WISH to make an appointment with you. There is only a license under common law for people to be able to visit me on my property without express permission: the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 QB per Lord Evershed M.R.). Therefore take note that I revoke license under common law for you or your representatives to visit me at my property and if you do so, then you will be liable to damages for a tort of trespass and civil action will be taken.

 

Yours Faithfully

Don't sign, just print your name

 

 

 

As for the rest of the question, someone will be along shortly to advise correctly :)

DCA's - they have the same power as an infinite number of untrained chimps working on a script for Hamlet, but the chimps would probably at least get it right :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Add this to the letter

 

Dear Morons

 

You have today contacted me with reference to an alledged debt apparently owed by myself to talk talk. but have omitted any relevant details of how this debt is comprised.

 

To my knowledge I settled the said account in full on such and such date.

 

if you insist that this debt is valid then please provide me with the relevant information.

 

Failure to respond in a positive manner within 14 days will leave me with no recourse but to report your pathetic company to TS; OFT and the FSA.

 

If you do not understand this letter then please pass it to the next monkey in the food chain.

 

amend to suit of course:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm Very strange now, we've had BCW call us tonight on MY mobile number wishing to discuss the account. The number was 0845 878 0516.

 

How the hell did they get this, and what can be done to stop them ringing me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to OH's Talk Talk debt - BCW writing

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...