Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

    • It sounds like people with something to hide, TJ.
    • I have already posted this on another forum but posting it here for more reach,  been told to get proper legal advice which i think i might have to do, About 2 weeks ago i recently completed on the purchase of a house in a small town and moved all my stuff in.  After being away for a few days clearing out my old flat i come back to find the post man knocking at my door with what i can only describe as a small stack of post . In it was over 400 letters all with different names on.  Some peoples name and some company names.   I put them to one side having started a new job, over the next few days i come home to literally hundreds more  Over 2 weeks i have several thousand letters and feel  very overwhelmed I manage to speak to the postman and ask him what is going on and he says he has been delivering this volume of mail for the last 18 months  So i open quite a large number of them and they are from companies like Excel Parking Ltd, Parking Eye Ltd Smart Parking Ltd.  There are also parking tickets from different councils and speeding tickets.  I have also seem some log books from the dvla and letters from debt collectors I contact my solicitor who i brought the house through and the estate agent to get hold of the person who sold me the house and they have asked the couple to get in contact as I have no forwarding address or phone number.  They said when they were selling it that they were moving abroad (i dont know where) I have literally no idea what to do now and literally piles and piles of mail  To top it of i had a bailiff turn up today looking for some one but said he had been here before  My friends say it must be a scam and someone said it sounds like a mailbox address which i dont really understand What can I do ??  help!!!!!!
    • So republicans are blocking the release of the Epstein files   Republicans move to block Democratic effort to force release of Epstein files | Jeffrey Epstein | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM White House has come under fire for not releasing documents related to late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein   I think that finally defines whos in there eh?
    • Yes it is exactly that. Draft a letter of claim and post it here so we can have a look. It's a shame that you have been taking so long about this. It was all predictable. If you have read the stories on the sub- forum you will see that what you're going through is nothing new. By hanging around and trying to go through the process you are ceding control to them. Let's see your letter of claim. Bear in mind it won't be a bluff. 14 days and then on day 15 you issue the claim. If you aren't prepared to do that then frankly you may as well give up
    • Yes they were most probably waiting on yours so to counter your arguments rather than put forward the facts in support of their claim. If say by Mondays till no sign then as per my previous post and whilst your on to the court check if they have paid the hearing fee thats usually a sign that they wish to proceed.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Recommended Posts

I've come seeking help with a problem my OH has.

 

He owed approx £2k to Yorkshire Bank for a credit card (a lot of that figure was interest + charges) and had a County Court Judgement filed against him in 2004 and an order to repay £10 a month.

 

This he has been doing faithfully since 2004, however he recently received a letter from Phoenix Recovery informing him they had bought the debt and demanding full repayment of £2092.42 which we're sure was the amount of the original judgement!

 

Now he's received a letter from Mortimer Clarke Solicitors acting on behalf of Phoenix stating they will serve him with a Statutory Demand whereupon, if he fails to repay the amount in full within 21 days, they'll file a bankruptcy petition to court.

 

So a few questions:

 

  1. Were Yorkshire within their rights to sell on a debt that was subject to a County Court Order? If so:
  2. Are Phoenix within their rights to demand a full repayment when a County Court Order stated repayment would be made at £10 a month and my OH has not defaulted on that?
  3. Does the County Order still stand now the debt has been sold on and, if it doesn't, can my OH demand a full statement of accounts to explain why the figure demanded takes no account of 5 years worth of payments? (£600)
  4. Can they make him bankrupt when all he's done is kept to the terms of the County Court Order and paid £10 a month?

 

Any help appreciated here :) Thanks in advance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for the advice. If the County Court Judgement still stands, despite the debt being sold on and the new 'owners' Phoenix demanding full repayment of the original amount I wonder if they'll now claim he's defaulted.

 

The reason I say that is that their first communication which stated they now owned the debt explicitly stated that my OH should a) stop paying Yorkshire the monthly £10 ordered by the court and b) stated they would only accept full repayment. My OH hasn't sent any money to this outfit given their statement. Can they spin this and now state he's in default of the CCJ even though they told him they wouldn't accept the regular £10 payments? (it's now 2 months since his last payment to Yorkshire)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for the advice. If the County Court Judgement still stands, despite the debt being sold on and the new 'owners' Phoenix demanding full repayment of the original amount I wonder if they'll now claim he's defaulted.

 

The reason I say that is that their first communication which stated they now owned the debt explicitly stated that my OH should a) stop paying Yorkshire the monthly £10 ordered by the court and b) stated they would only accept full repayment. My OH hasn't sent any money to this outfit given their statement. Can they spin this and now state he's in default of the CCJ even though they told him they wouldn't accept the regular £10 payments? (it's now 2 months since his last payment to Yorkshire)

 

 

Basically, he was ordered by the court to pay yorkshire £10 a month, unless Yorkshire tell him different then he has no alternative to keep paying Yorkshire, (make sure payments are brought up to date) As far as the "new" dca is concerned, they can whistle. Until you receive paperwork from the person owing the debt, then the original court decision and stuplations are still applicable. Nobody can come along and unilaterally change the stipulations of a CCJ without taking you back to court, this includes demanding payment in full. It would be fun to see them take you back to court and explain that a CCJ is already in place and they are trying to con you into paying more than was ordered.

 

There is a common scenario where a "new DCA" appears out of the woodwork, claiming that they now own the debt and payments should be made to them, the debtor duly follows suit and cancels the repayment plan they have in [place and makes payment to the "new DCA" after a suitable period of time the original creditor contacts the debtor and asks why you aren't paying them, they then seek further enforcement action. When challenged, the "new dca" simply claims an administrative error. You have defaulted the CCJ.

 

I would suggest an immediate complaint to trading standards and also a letter to Yorkshire, voicing your concerns that a third party is attempting to collect against a debt that they own and since they haven't informed you of this sale/transfer......

 

At the very least it will show up Yorkshire as failing to inform you when they have sold/ttransferred the debt.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for the information!

 

My OH has now written off to Northampton CC Bulk Centre with a query/complaint on this matter. He's also hit Phoenix/Mortimer Clarke with a Subject Access Request for good measure to see where the hell they've come up with this new debt figure from.

 

He'll make a complaint to Trading Standards today.

 

Shower of ****s these people! He wants to pay back this debt and has been doing so and they change the goalposts! :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...