Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

    • actually, we must apologise as you did mention it. IMHO this should have been mentioned in your defence. we screwed up. dx      
    • Thanks. Maybe you could have a look at my summary – and go through it and confirm my understandings. Also, now that you have evidence recorded I think it would be a good idea to reveal the name of the dealer. I know the name already because you posted up on Facebook – but I think it will be a good idea to post it here. There is no downside. It might attract other people who have had similar experiences and who may be helpful to you and of course it may be helpful to others in a similar situation. We normally find that publishing the name of dealers is helpful because once they realise that their reputation is at risk, though sometimes start to become compliant. Also, if we have the name of the dealer you may be able to make our own research which will help to refine our advice.
    • good evening guys lookinforinfo many thanks for your reply and support. Thanks for getting the team to move the posts to a MSG thread. I wanted to avoid any confrontation but i feel helpless against these evil  morons, i should not have to fight it and hope the court sees things in my favour, its the whole process that makes me want to kill somebody, i wont but im not always in control of my actions due to my  mental health condition.   All going well i wont hear from the police but who knows, ill just have to wait and see, the morons deserved it but i did not go there to cause agro, i was held in an impossible situation. I have told doctors many times i might end up in jail or kill someone or kill myself.    FTMDave thanks for your reply i will let you guys know if i hear anything.   ------------------------- Today i called Citizens Advice and told them everything including my vulnerabilities, i have a phone appointment on the 22nd to discuss the illegal PCN. Im not sure what they can do but ill see if my vulnerabilities help in any way  
    • Sorry I was just editing because I didn't seee your first reply. My bad sorry and yeah 70% criminology and 30% counselling, just give me more options when I graduate. Victim support etc.. how ironic lol 😆 
    • No particular relevance – but always interested to know what university students are studying. I have known lots of criminology students – but I have never heard of a degree which involves criminology plus counselling. I hope it works well for you. What about the answers to the rest of the questions?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Recommended Posts

Well it was a while ago but here's the basic story so far

 

Lloyds filed a claim against me for £312 back in December 2006

I defended and counterclaimed for my charges

Lloyds failed to attend the hearing in May 2007

I won and was awarded my charges, lloyds were ordered to remove any default notices from my credit files

Eventually lloyds paid up and I thought the matter was closed

 

Fast forward to now and I've just checked my credit file for the first time since the case and guess what... default notice still there and has been reported every month up til November 2008.

 

So my questions are

 

1. Presumably I am best taking this up directly with Lloyds rather than going to their monkeys at [problem]

2. As a default notice has been plaguing my credit file for the last 18 months when a judge ordered it's removal would it be cheeky to ask (or demand) compensation from them. Any reasonable amounts?

3. If Lloyds refuse to pay ball is there anyway I can get the court to enforce that section of my judgement against them?

All my posts are made without prejudice and may not be reused or reproduced without my express permission (or the permission of the forums owners)!

 

17/10/2006 Recieve claim against me from lloyds TSB for £312.82

18/10/06 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent

03/02/07 Claim allocated to small claims. Hearing set for 15/05/07. Lloyds ordered to file statement setting out how they calculate their charges

15/05/07 Lloyds do not attend. Judgement ordered for £192 approx, £3 travel costs and removal of default notice

29/05/07 4pm Lloyds deadline for payment of CCJ expires. Warrant of execution ready to go

19/06/07 Letter from court stating Lloyds have made a cheque payment to court

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bump.... anyone?

 

EDIT - Requested move to the CRAs section as relevant there and may get more response

Edited by davethorp

All my posts are made without prejudice and may not be reused or reproduced without my express permission (or the permission of the forums owners)!

 

17/10/2006 Recieve claim against me from lloyds TSB for £312.82

18/10/06 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent

03/02/07 Claim allocated to small claims. Hearing set for 15/05/07. Lloyds ordered to file statement setting out how they calculate their charges

15/05/07 Lloyds do not attend. Judgement ordered for £192 approx, £3 travel costs and removal of default notice

29/05/07 4pm Lloyds deadline for payment of CCJ expires. Warrant of execution ready to go

19/06/07 Letter from court stating Lloyds have made a cheque payment to court

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the absence of any response, I've drafted the following letter which will be going to Lloyds TSB head office first recorded tomorrow

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

I write regarding my old current account that I held with you at my previous address of XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX referenced above and the court proceedings you issued against me, also referenced above, that I defended and successfully counterclaimed against.

 

In that judgement, a copy of which is enclosed for your reference, you were ordered to pay me £200.32 which I am pleased to say you did (eventually and after I had to obtain a warrant of execution). However you were also ordered to remove any default notices you had registered with the credit reference agencies.

 

It has come to my attention, that there is still a default notice on my credit file which has been updated each and every month since the court hearing. I enclose a screen print from my credit file for your reference.

 

What I now require from you is as follows

 

1. The default notice is to be removed from any and all credit reference agencies to which you report as per the orders of District Judge XXXXXXX of the Preston County Court. Please note this record is to be removed from my credit files and not merely amended or marked as satisfied.

 

2. As the presence of a default notice on my file for a period of 18 months following an order for its removal has no doubt had a detrimental effect on my ability to obtain credit or indeed a current account equivalent to the one I previously held with yourselves I require a compensation payment of no less than £250 from yourselves for the defamation I have suffered

 

You have 14 days to comply with the above otherwise I may be forced to file a further claim in the county court to enforce the original judgement and seek compensation. I will also report your non compliance with the judge’s order to the information commissioner as well as the court who may view your actions as contemptuous. I trust this will not become necessary.

 

Please note that as I have moved home, any correspondence on this matter as well as payments of compensation should be sent to the address at the top of this letter (XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) and not my previous address.

 

Yours Sincerely

All my posts are made without prejudice and may not be reused or reproduced without my express permission (or the permission of the forums owners)!

 

17/10/2006 Recieve claim against me from lloyds TSB for £312.82

18/10/06 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent

03/02/07 Claim allocated to small claims. Hearing set for 15/05/07. Lloyds ordered to file statement setting out how they calculate their charges

15/05/07 Lloyds do not attend. Judgement ordered for £192 approx, £3 travel costs and removal of default notice

29/05/07 4pm Lloyds deadline for payment of CCJ expires. Warrant of execution ready to go

19/06/07 Letter from court stating Lloyds have made a cheque payment to court

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Sorry to bump a thread where I've been talking to myself but thought I'd update people.

 

Following the last letter I got a reply from LTSBs solicitors today. They've removed the default as ordered and made a compensation offer which whilst less than the figure I asked for I have accepted.

 

So after nearly 3 years it looks like this is finally over

All my posts are made without prejudice and may not be reused or reproduced without my express permission (or the permission of the forums owners)!

 

17/10/2006 Recieve claim against me from lloyds TSB for £312.82

18/10/06 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent

03/02/07 Claim allocated to small claims. Hearing set for 15/05/07. Lloyds ordered to file statement setting out how they calculate their charges

15/05/07 Lloyds do not attend. Judgement ordered for £192 approx, £3 travel costs and removal of default notice

29/05/07 4pm Lloyds deadline for payment of CCJ expires. Warrant of execution ready to go

19/06/07 Letter from court stating Lloyds have made a cheque payment to court

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...