Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Barclaycard help please, really confused about CCA


Recommended Posts

Guest brightwhite1

Hello,

 

Really hope i have posted this in the correct place. I'm getting myself really confused navigating the forums...along with all things financial!

 

I recently sent out requests for my agreements under the CCA. I must admit to not fully understanding matters despite trying to. I have had some replies, mostly refusals to supply the info. One that has replied is Barclaycard and they have sent me a photocopy of their Barclaycard conditions.

 

I don't really know what to do next. I called today saying I had requested a true copy of my agreement, but the legal department told me all they had to supply was what they did.

 

Could someone possibly tell me what I should be doing next?

 

Thanks very much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

Really hope i have posted this in the correct place. I'm getting myself really confused navigating the forums...along with all things financial!

 

I recently sent out requests for my agreements under the CCA.

How many requests. Who to, and what for (Loands, C Cards , Overdrafts?)

I must admit to not fully understanding matters despite trying to. I have had some replies, mostly refusals to supply the info. One that has replied is Barclaycard and they have sent me a photocopy of their Barclaycard conditions. Just a photo of the conditions? No persoanl details?

 

I don't really know what to do next. I called today saying I had requested a true copy of my agreement, but the legal department told me all they had to supply was what they did.

 

DO NOT call them, EVER! From here on in you must only correspond in WRITING. You cannot be easily hassled by letter, they cannot make ridiculous claims and then deny they have. You will have a complete record. You cannot have that with telephone calls

 

Could someone possibly tell me what I should be doing next?

 

Pop up a copy of what they have sent you. Scan the paper(s) into Photobucket, and put the link on a post in this thread. REMOVE any personal details though :)

 

Then tell us what else you are sweating on, and you will receive some more assistance.

 

Thanks very much.

 

Cheers, Vex

If my advice or input has helped, by all means tip my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest brightwhite1

Hi,

 

Thanks so much for your reply, very much appreciated.

 

I will attempt to figure out how to use a scanner (...I know) and get it scanned if I possibly can! They just sent a photocopy of Barclaycard conditions with no personal details at all. An attached letter apologises for the delay, says it is a copy of my agreement at the time I opened my account and that the info is provided under section 78 of the CCA.

 

The letter says it completes their obligations. When i called the lady in the legal and regulatory complicance department tied me in knots and basically told me in no uncertain terms that that was all they were required to supply. I definitely won't phone again, lesson learned.

 

Ah...there are quite a few others, but my organisational skills are as bad as my financial skills.

 

Bank of Scotland (credit card) ignored me.

 

Cabot returned two postal orders for two Clydesdale accounts (loan and credit card) saying they were not obliged to supply the info and I should go back to Clydesdale. Thing is Cabot actually own my debts, not just manage them or so I have been told.

 

Egg (card) sent me a letter saying because I didn't sign the letter asking for my agreement they wouldn't send it unless i signed a new letter. I thought I read online not to sign the letter...that is why I didn't.

 

Link said they bought my debt from Cahoot (loan) and MBNA (credit card) in 2007 but didn't have the information and would request it from MBNA and Cahoot. The letter said the money I sent would be allocated to my account and they would charge me if MBNA or Cahoot charged them for supplying info.

 

Capquest own my old Nat West debt and say they can't supply it, returned my order and said I had to go to Nat West.

 

Sorry there is so many. I have no idea what to do next. For now i will go and figure out the scanner and Photobucket. Thanks very much.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thanks so much for your reply, very much appreciated.

 

I will attempt to figure out how to use a scanner (...I know) and get it scanned if I possibly can! Good. Get that up here as soon as you are able to.

 

They just sent a photocopy of Barclaycard conditions with no personal details at all. Then it is not an enforceable agreement An attached letter apologises for the delay, says it is a copy of my agreement at the time I opened my account and that the info is provided under section 78 of the CCA. That is not a lie. It is also NOT enforceable though.

 

The letter says it completes their obligations. Which it would, but that has no negative implications for you.:) When i called the lady in the legal and regulatory complicance department tied me in knots and basically told me in no uncertain terms that that was all they were required to supply. They are obliged to supply what they have. If that is what they have, then you will not be parting with any money that you have - not from now on. I definitely won't phone again, lesson learned. Good. NO PHONES :p

 

Ah...there are quite a few others, but my organisational skills are as bad as my financial skills.

 

Bank of Scotland (credit card) ignored me. Looks quite positive then.

 

Cabot returned two postal orders for two Clydesdale accounts (loan and credit card) saying they were not obliged to supply the info and I should go back to Clydesdale. Thing is Cabot actually own my debts, not just manage them or so I have been told. Cabot capitulating like that is again, quite positive.

 

Egg (card) sent me a letter saying because I didn't sign the letter asking for my agreement they wouldn't send it unless i signed a new letter. I thought I read online not to sign the letter...that is why I didn't.

They are F.O.S. Did you put an electronic signature on letter??? If you did not, then reprint with a signature on, and send that off to them. Believe me, if they had an enforceable copy of your agreement, then i suspect they would have shoved it under you nose PDQ - with or without your signature.

 

Link said they bought my debt from Cahoot (loan) and MBNA (credit card) in 2007 but didn't have the information and would request it from MBNA and Cahoot. The letter said the money I sent would be allocated to my account and they would charge me if MBNA or Cahoot charged them for supplying info. B******s. A quid it is for each request, a quid is all they get. If their internal process costs are high tough s**t.

 

Capquest own my old Nat West debt and say they can't supply it, returned my order and said I had to go to Nat West. Great news

 

Sorry there is so many. I have no idea what to do next. For now i will go and figure out the scanner and Photobucket. Thanks very much.

 

Photobucket them if you can

 

Vex

If my advice or input has helped, by all means tip my scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest brightwhite1

Fantastic, thanks so much.

 

Gives me a little bit of hope to hang on to for now at least. Spurs me on, thanks.

 

Current scanner doesn't seem to be happening, but I am gonna try and borrow the use of one tomorrow and will scan in.

 

Cheers again,

 

Vee

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BW,

 

Just stick to discussing the BC a/c on this thread- open up new threads as necessary to d/w the other a/c's. :)

 

The doc'ts you have scanned are BC's normal response at the mo. Just a set of their T&C's which is certainly not a valid Credit Agreement. This seems to end in a stale-mate with you saying they've no valid agree't and them saying they've complied and they'll continue to collect with their normal procedures.

 

Have a look here for an alternative strategy - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/173201-why-you-shouldnt-use.html

 

Come back with any queries.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest brightwhite1

Ok, will do that thanks.

 

Had a look at that thread but to be truthful found it all pretty complex to understand. Does that mean I would have to essentially take Barclaycard to court or have i totally not followed?

 

I'm beginning to think I might be better trying to use a solicitor or one of the firms you hear about as I reckon all the technical legal things are going to be way out of my league. Will see if I can make some more sense of it first though.

 

Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Brightwhite.

 

You may find it all looks a bit complex to start with.

 

But after you spend some time reading other threads and getting used to the terminology, it'll start to make more sense.

 

It's your choice about using a solicitor (very costly) or a charges claim firm (they'll take a cut of over 30%) to get your charges back.

 

But you can use the knowledge and expertise available on this site for nothing along with all the template letters. Most of all, you'll get no end of help and advice along with loads of inspiration.

 

So, if you don't understand something, re-read it and then ask your questions. Someone will always try and help you.

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
Guest brightwhite1

Hi,

 

Thanks very much.

 

Still wading through all this CCA stuff. Have been reading and reading but still as confused as ever. Decided against solictor and am going to try and get it together and chase all the lack of replies to requests and the ones that have come back with just applications.

 

I am still finding it hard to figure out the site though, could anyone possibly post me a link of where I should post about my other CCA requests/updates? I keep getting lost on the site (really!) Thanks very much.

 

Also, I think I have been extra stupid...was reading somewhere on the forum that you aren't allowed to challenge agreements under the CCA if you have claimed back excess charges...I did this through FOS long before I knew anything about the CCA....does that mean I am not allowed to challenge potentially unenforceable agreements.....

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BW,

 

Click here - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/#consumer-forums-center-bank - you'll be at the top of the Bank Action Group. Scroll down and you'll find forums for all the banks and credits cards.

 

Start a new thread in the appropriate forum for each case.

 

Do not confuse the relaiming of charges with the enforceability of a credit agreement as they are two very different matters, which are not directly related.

 

You can reclaim charges on an account and then challenge the enforceability of that account, if there is a faulty agreement, or none at all.

 

There may be a valid agreement but you can still reclaim charges.

 

You can contend an agreement is unenforceable and then insist that penalty charges be repaid direct to you, and not be used to reduce the balance left on the account.

 

In short, I don't think you've compromised your position by reclaiming charges before challenging the enforceability of an account. :)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest brightwhite1

Thanks so, so much. Bank action group, under name of bank, separate post for each company. Brilliant. Now i know exactly what to do.

 

Phew, what a relief! So even though I have claimed back charges I am still allowed to check and possibly challenge the enforceability of agreements. Fantastic news.

 

If only i had known about the CCA before, as nearly all of my refunds went directly back to reduce the balance of the accounts. I have one complaint just now with FOS who even though my account was completely sold to a dca whilst my complaint about charges was on and the original bank didn't own it anymore when I agreed the amount from FOS, the refund was given to the dca. Tried to challenge it with FOS but not getting anywhere, and haven't been for months. Will try again though.

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...