Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Recommended Posts

Hi, we sent our first letter stating our claim 8 weeks ago, we have now received a reply stating that according to their records when we took out the loan we were told that they only had one type of insurance product available, a single premium policy which would be added to the loan and was over a five year term. They say that we were quoted with and without the payment protection policy so we could choose if we want it or not. They say we were asked about any pre-existing medical conditions (we werent). They go on to say that the loan was taken out before they were regulated by the FSA or the GISC.

 

We consider we were missold the policy for the following reasons:

1. I was not asked about pre-existing medical conditions.

2. Due to the fact that we paid a single premium for the policy but did not see it throught to the end of its initial term after paying back my loan earlier than planned.

3. I was told that i had to have the policy to get the loan.

4. I was not told the policy was optional

5. I was not informed the policy would only cover the loan for 5 years.

Is there any hope or should we just give up?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, we sent our first letter stating our claim 8 weeks ago, we have now received a reply stating that according to their records when we took out the loan we were told that they only had one type of insurance product available, a single premium policy which would be added to the loan and was over a five year term. They say that we were quoted with and without the payment protection policy so we could choose if we want it or not. They say we were asked about any pre-existing medical conditions (we werent). They go on to say that the loan was taken out before they were regulated by the FSA or the GISC.

 

We consider we were missold the policy for the following reasons:

1. I was not asked about pre-existing medical conditions.

2. Due to the fact that we paid a single premium for the policy but did not see it throught to the end of its initial term after paying back my loan earlier than planned.

3. I was told that i had to have the policy to get the loan.

4. I was not told the policy was optional

5. I was not informed the policy would only cover the loan for 5 years.

Is there any hope or should we just give up?

 

 

Hello and welcome,

 

They want you to give up, so they don't have to pay up:rolleyes:

 

Reclaiming back ppi is not the easiest thing to do, and can take a bit of time, but you have to show them that you will not give up at the first hurdle;)

 

I presume that Norton are the brokers, so who is the lender?????

 

Has commission ever been disclosed:D

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi again, wonder if anyone can help me?

 

We had our final response from Norton saying saying no to our claim for PPI, we then reported them to the FOS a few months ago. Today FOS have written to us stating that as Norton were not members of the FOS or GISC when we took out the loan there is nothing they can do. Reported to FLA and they cant help either. Do we have any other options?

Link to post
Share on other sites

And if you get no luck with that the only option left is taking them to court.

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jessie:)

 

We are in a similar position as yourself, although as yet we haven't received a response from Norton - but I can guess what they are going to say.

 

I've had a look at the link aa provided and it appears to say that the Financial Services Compensation Scheme is for firms that were regulated by the FSA but are no longer in business, so I have a feeling they won't be able to help.

 

This seems most unfair, I don't know about you, but our claim is for around £10,000 inc interest and I can't believe we're not going to be able to get it back - it makes you sick that they can rip you off and get away with it:eek:

 

Anyway, don't give up - there may still be a way.

 

Regards,

 

Landy x

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your reasons for being mis-sold are strong and can be proven in a court this is the way to go if no other options are available.

 

Anyway, don't give up

 

And that I totally agree

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...