Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

    • A Labour MP says GB Energy should buy British to avoid the risk of forced labour in supply chains.View the full article
    • The world's race to decarbonise has led to the rise of electric cars - and with it, soaring demand for lithium, which is required for the batteriesView the full article
    • New thread started as you & LFI suggested.  It's best to have one ticket per thread, if not people get confused about which ticket they're giving advice for. Firstly, you have every right to be absolutely fuming at MFG.  You go twice and spend money - and what do you get?  A demand for £100!  Do the people who caused this mess resolve it?  No, they lie and mess you about.  No wonder you're so angry. However ... we're worried you’re leaving yourself open to accusations of theft (even though you made it clear the goods would be returned) and criminal damage.  If you take the initiative and approach the garage politely, (a) that covers yourself at least a bit regarding any possible criminal accusations, and (b) if the manager has a brain you two can easily sort everything out. I say if the manager has a brain.  They might try and play the hard case and stupidly put the blame on you.  Who knows. Anyway, how about sending this 1st class post on Monday?   Dear Manager, I am the person who temporarily took some non-perishable goods from the BP shop on Wednesday and left a letter. I have since calmed down and am writing this letter in a friendly, amicable way between adults without abuse or at all costs apportioning blame. What happened is that some time back I visited your premises at 3.15am to buy fuel.  I then revisited at 8.30pm the same day to use the shop. Afterwards I received an invoice from Euro Car Parks for £100 (discounted to £60 if paid within 14 days). What happened is that the ANPR cameras joined the two visits together and ECP issued the invoice for me staying an absurd 17 hours.  I mean you provide a good service but who would stay 17 hours! If you Google "double dipping" you will see that this is a continual problem in the private parking industry and the industry’s own Code of Practice highlights how steps should be taken to avoid issuing invoices in these cases. When I brought this to MFG's customer services' attention you refused to have the invoice cancelled.  I also visited you and again you were unhelpful. Please "take a step backwards" and put yourself in my position.  Say you visited a supermarket on a Saturday evening.  You also visited on a Sunday evening. Later you got a demand for £100 from a private parking company.  You politely asked the supermarket to intervene but they refused.  I think you would consider the matter unfair and you would be extremely angry with the appalling customer service. Anyone who has even a rough knowledge of the law knows that ECP are your agents, you called them in.  You are the organ grinder.  They are the monkey.  You can easily tell them to cancel this invoice. So i am writing to request an appointment with you in order firstly to return the goods which are yours and of course which I should never have taken.  I would like us to be able to speak in a friendly, adult manner. However, secondly I am not prepared to take all the blame for this matter.  I also request confirmation from you that you have had this unfair invoice cancelled. Yours,
    • A new generation of wealth creators has fuelled demand for private members-only clubs in Asia's third largest economy.View the full article
    • well post it to youtube or facebook. so we can look at it.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Recommended Posts

Hi there

 

I've had 3 complaints in with the FOS for the last year. They have only just got round to dealing with them!!! Anyway, all 3 were mere formalities and I sent the complaints because I was getting nowhere with the banks.

 

All complaints are in connection with contravention of the CCA in relation to non-existent agreements. I have been sent photocopy application forms. The first complaint was a bit different but the other 2 were straightforward ie an application form is not a consumer credit agreement because it has no prescribed terms.

 

I received a letter from an adjudicator last week advising me that he had not upheld my complaint because I had signed the application form. He upheld in favour of MBNA on this basis. He did advise me that this was to be dealt with purely on a statutory duty and enforcement basis.

 

I have written back stating the terms of the CCA 1974 which outlines the prescribed terms. I have asked him to advise me where these prescribed terms are visible in the application form he has.

 

I also advised him that he was misleading me into believing that an application form is an enforceable document when indeed it is not.

 

I await hearing from them.

 

Has anybody else has this type of judgement on their complaint with FOS? I'm astounded because they should know that law inside out and if they dont then they shouldnt be responsible for dealing with complaints. Also, it appears to me that they are not an unbiased organisation. They are clearly on the side of the financial institutions which, really, doesnt surprise me because that is where they make their money.

 

This is so unjust!!!

 

Gemspan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

Yes I agree with you both but what worries me is that this is an organisation who is there to deal with complaints relating to the Financial Services Industry. Its the only place you can go without going to court.

 

The people handling these claims should be fully versed in the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and abide by the Act. I'm able to fight back, but what about the people who take what they say as gospel? Its terrible!!

 

The FOS state:

 

The matter is clearly one of statutory duty and enforceability of a credit agreement. It is evident that you signed the credit agreement and received the benefit of the money from MBNA and accordingly you are liable for the debt outstanding on the account...... I would advise that in relation to your Section 78 of the Consumer Credit Act request, the Law does not require a lender to provide copies of the credit agreement which show the original signatures. However, a copy of your application form, signed and dated by you, was provided by Alliance & Leicester......

 

You are liable to the debt oustanding on your MBNA credit card and as you breached the credit agreement (what credit agreement?) a default has been registered on your credit reference file. In view of this, I have to tell you that I am unable to recommend that your complaint should be upheld. I appreciate that this is likely to come as a disappointment to you. I know that this is not the outcome you were hoping for. But I hope that my explanation has been helpful in setting out clearly why I have taken this view....

 

They are clearly overlooking the fact that I didnt sign a credit agreement. I signed an application form which doesnt set out any credit limit, rate of interest etc., etc., As far as he knows this account could have been a zero interest account and hence all the monies I have paid have more than paid the account and MBNA would be owing me money!!! Scandalous!

 

I've written back in clear terms setting him straight where he has gone wrong so I will wait with bated breath to hear what he has to say. Will keep you informed.

 

Gemspan

Link to post
Share on other sites

What did you write in the "please tell us what your complaint is about" box on the Financial Ombudsman complaint form?

 

Just wondering what specific aspect you were asking them to rule on.

 

The reason I ask is that we have an agreement which, although signed by us, is probably unenforceable, and we are trying to work out how to force the issue without being harrassed by debt collectors, sued, etc.

 

By what you've said about your case(s), it hardly seems worth bothering with the Financial Ombudsman Service in these cases.

 

My thread is here:-

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/egg/174507-militant-consumers-friend-egg.html

(the reason I think it's unenforceable is that a copy of our agreement is used in the Consumer Action Group Guide to Credit Agreements as an example of an unenforceable agreement!):-

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/162851-consumer-credit-agreements.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to MBNA Fos Say Application Form Is A Cca Agreement!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...