Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Recommended Posts

Hello,can anyone help me out? My father has received two letters from a debt recovery company called capquest.They claim they've purchased a debt from littlewoods finance and he owes nearly 200 pounds,which they are demanding be paid.

The second letter he was sent states that they are intending to progress the account to their pre-litigation system and also threatens to send ballifs around to his house.As my father is in his late 60's,you can imagine the worry this is putting him through!

Here's the thing though,he has no idea what this debt relates to as he has never had finance from littlewoods in any way,shape or form.He dismissed the first letter as a [problem] and googling capquest led me here to you good people.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated,thankyou.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

You are right, they are on a phishing trip for someone with a similar name.

You can ignore them or send them this letter.

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account no:

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

**Edit to suit**

 

Remember, don’t sign the letter.Just print your name.

 

 

If you decide to send the letter, do it by recorded delivery as otherwise they will deny ever receiving it.

 

 

They won't send bailiffs round. It has to go to court first and if they did try it, they would get laughed out of court as you are not the person they are chasing.

Hope that helps.

 

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Well Well,

My partner has had the same two letters as well in the past week or so, claiming to be a past Littlewoods debt of £80.18p.

 

She insists that she has never had any credit with Littlewoods, in fact she has never had credit with any company as she doesn't believe in it, and is probabaly a lot wiser than I have ever been I suspect.

 

The 'Letter Before Action' is a particularly threatening one as well, probably done to make people pay up even though they don't owe any money.:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

capquest should not be allowed to get away with this disgraceful behaviour. Report them to TS, the OFT and your MP. What they are doing is WRONG.

 

Yes it is disgraceful, and I'm sure that we are not the only two people that are the victims of this abuse.

I have now written a letter to them as in the above post with another paragraph at the end demanding a full apology.

 

I expect a full apology from you concerning this matter. Be in no doubt that if you continue to harass me I will start complaints as mentioned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello silverfox! Thought i'd let you know after sending off the letter you posted above,my father has today received a letter of apology stating that after investigating further,they now consider the matter closed.Apparently,someone in the local area has the same name as my father.....not chuffin' likely!

After reading the replies to the post and searching for capquest on this forum,it is clear that this practice of phishing is common for the company in question,with some poor souls actually paying debts that they know nothing about.With that in mind,plus the worry they've caused,i've decided to report them to the OFT and the trading standards regardless of them dropping the matter,as in my opinion,they should be stopped.

Thanks again silverfox,you're a saint!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now where did I put that halo :D

 

No thanks are due to me. I only passed on to you what I gleaned from this wondeful site.

 

Keep that letter as there is a very small chance capquest will sell it on to some other mug and try again.

 

Glad it got sorted quickly.

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...