Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Recommended Posts

My 22 yr old daughter worked for a video/games rental chain, I shant name them, but suffice to say they're a multi-national company and probably the largest in the business, certainly in the Uk.

 

She was a supervisor and keyholder, and as such was responsible for attending the store whenever the alarm was triggered in order to allow entrance to the alarm engineer so the alarm could be reset.

She resigned from their employ giving the required period of notice, she resigned because the branch manager wouldn't authorise disbursment (disbursal ?) for a taxi on a particularly stormy night, she resigned of her own volition and whilst employed by them has never faced any disciplinary action.

 

 

She is now trying to recover money they owe her for attending these call-outs, approx £400, the problem is that her employer is disputing how many she did, they were never filled in on any timesheet, hours were worked out from a time clock when employees clocked in/out, she wasn't allowed to clock in/out when attending call-outs because that would mess up her hours (staff only being advised to clock in/out once in any 24 hours).

 

My daughter has contacted the alrm company involved in order to obtain the dates/times when they were called out, this information would back up her claim, the alarm company have been helpful but have stated that they cannot release this info to her because of the Data Protection act, obviously her ex employer could obtain this information but so far have been unable/unwilling to do so.

She has also been in touch with her mobile phone service provider in order to obtain her recieved calls records, which again, would show when and how often the alarm company called her, however T Mobile tell her they can only provide this information if a court issues a summons.

 

This has been ongoing since Sept 2008, the reason for this lengthy period is that for several months storemanagers and area managers promised to get it sorted and never bothered, she then sent a recorded delivery letter to her ex employers head office stating that if the matter wasn't resolved within 28 days she would take action via the small claims court, this at least resulted in an offer being made to her, that offer was in the sum of £175, naturally she refused it, her employers are stating that they have no way of knowing how many call outs she attended.

 

So, a few questions.

 

Does an employer have a statutory obligation to keep a record of hours worked ?

 

Is it reasonable to expect them to be able to obtain information from one of their own Sub-Contractors (the alarm company)

 

Can anyone offer absolutely any advice whatsoever ? following her refual of their offer (made via telephone) her ex employers have once again gone silent, sadly my daughter has had months of this and is obviously frustrated at trying to obtain what is legally owed to her, I might add for getting out of bed at ridiculous hours in order to carry out her duties.

All advice gratefully recieved.

Apologies for the long post, I just wanted to give as much info as possible, if anyone needs any more info I'll be happy to post it.

Phil.

Edited by Pozidriva
Spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

Press on with the small claims action - make sure your daughter has some written record of the dates and times of the alarm call outs to take to court.

 

I suspect that they will not even bother to attend court but if they do you need to be prepared.

 

If you dont know the dates and times you can use the Civil procedure rules to request the information from the company as you are in process of taking action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...