Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

    • good evening guys lookinforinfo many thanks for your reply and support. Thanks for getting the team to move the posts to a MSG thread. I wanted to avoid any confrontation but i feel helpless against these evil  morons, i should not have to fight it and hope the court sees things in my favour, its the whole process that makes me want to kill somebody, i wont but im not always in control of my actions due to my  mental health condition.   All going well i wont hear from the police but who knows, ill just have to wait and see, the morons deserved it but i did not go there to cause agro, i was held in an impossible situation. I have told doctors many times i might end up in jail or kill someone or kill myself.    FTMDave thanks for your reply i will let you guys know if i hear anything.   ------------------------- Today i called Citizens Advice and told them everything including my vulnerabilities, i have a phone appointment on the 22nd to discuss the illegal PCN. Im not sure what they can do but ill see if my vulnerabilities help in any way  
    • Sorry I was just editing because I didn't seee your first reply. My bad sorry and yeah 70% criminology and 30% counselling, just give me more options when I graduate. Victim support etc.. ho ironic lol 😆 
    • No particular relevance – but always interested to know what university students are studying. I have known lots of criminology students – but I have never heard of a degree which involves criminology plus counselling. I hope it works well for you. What about the answers to the rest of the questions?
    • Yes im going to university in September studying criminology with counselling, everything you have said is correct. I have the voice recording of me asking him for a breakdown of what the £500 would be, then he offers me the new deal of straight swap oth the £200 service cost all recorded. I extended the warranty from 3 month to 12 month on his advice. The company is called handler protect and it was an extra £100. The warranty declined as they said it is due to age and not a sudden failure apparently.  Im unsure what you mean by a letter of rejection. I have sent a formal letter requesting a replacement or a refund on the advice CAB. That was sent on the 13th June.  And yes i paid for the original diagnostic from another reputable garage.  Hope this helps and thank you 😊 
    • Dx no matter how long I live and how much more I learn in the meantime I will never be able to match your level of subtlety.🙂
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Recommended Posts

Cut a long story short - I share the exact same name as my father and when I left home 3 years ago, for some reason (I can only assume he forwarded them on to me) I started recieving his unpaid bills and bailiff demands. After getting in contact with various different persons', I have been able to sort all of them out bar one, and this happens to be his unpaid Council Tax.

 

No matter what I do or how many times I contact them, after a few months they keep coming back to this address but today, without warning, I received a 24 hour notice for the removal of goods if I don't pay them immediately and I've hit a loose end because I'm stuck as to what my next course of action is.

 

I've shown them tenancy agreements, my passport, even gave them my father's address (where he still resides so God only knows why they are harrassing me) and yet they are still being persistent.

 

What do I do now? I was only 18 when I started recieving these demands and hadn't even started paying Council Tax, which I have proven, yet they are still chasing me up on £1000 arrears.

 

Please, any help would be appreciated as I don't want them removing my goods when I'm not at home.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Certified.

You'd have thought this would be such a straight forward thing to resolve.

Obvious question, have you contacted the council about this? They are in charge of the bailiffs and to whom the money is owed by your father. I would have thought they could easily verify what you are saying.

If they are not helpfull then I would make a formal complaint.

Best wishes.

Rae.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies!

 

Yes, the very first time I recieved a bailiff letter (about 2 years ago now) I arranged a meeting with the debt collector - showed him the relevant documents, which he noted and said that I needn't take any more actions. Second time around I got in contact with the local Council as before and since then I have received 2 final demands AND a letter from the Magistrates.

 

The last time I called them up, the lady from Equita insinuated that I was a liar. When I explained the situation AGAIN, I was met with the following response. "I find that hard to believe, if that was the case you wouldn't have left it so long to get in contact with us". Despite the fact that I had "supposedly" dealt with the situation 2 times previously.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My view, tbh, is to write to the CEO of the council marking the letter 'formal complaint'. Detail what has happened, what you have done to resolve the matter and why you are complaining. I would also use the letter as an excuse to complain about the bailiff company. Send recorded or hand deliver it and a copy to the bailiffs.

Also mention that if the matter is not resolved forthwith you will escalate it to the ombudsman.

Good luck.

Rae.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advice, Rae, I shall do that tomorrow!

 

Sorry if it seems a bit vague, it's just that I'm very naive with all of this stuff and feel like I'm in way over my head with it all. I've never been in trouble with the law and I've only recently discovered what a CCJ actually is so it's quite distressing being harrassed by Debt Collectors/Bailiffs and being sent Warrant of Arrest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, there is...

 

I presume that when forwarded the letters had your old address crossed out and your new one written in. If that's the case, either he is deliberately trying to confuse the council / bailiff or he is himself confused and genuinely thinks the mail is for you...

 

Either way, it's not yours, you've tried to resolve matters and it's now time to complain.

 

Rae.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I presume that when forwarded the letters had your old address crossed out and your new one written in. If that's the case, either he is deliberately trying to confuse the council / bailiff or he is himself confused and genuinely thinks the mail is for you...

 

Either way, it's not yours, you've tried to resolve matters and it's now time to complain.

 

Rae.

 

Most Councils address their envelopes as not to be redirected but to be returned to Sender. If the OP's father has therefore sent these on as some sort of payback or similar then he himself is going to be found out at some stage, by the look of things very quickly and could land himself in some serious doo-doos.

 

Now may be a good time to let the past go and to try and resolve differences before this gets really messy, not easy I know but someone has to start to offer the olive branch.

 

If you were only 18 when you started receiving these and the family had lived at the same address for a number of years before "supposedly" moving that would mean you would have been responsible for the CT since the age of 5 for example, someone at the Town hall needs to do their maths.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's no doubt that he is deliberately trying to confuse the Council/Debt Collectors as some of the bills I've had cannot be confused.

 

For instance, I received debt letters from Virgin Media and the apartment I'm in isn't even wired up for Virgin, which is why I'm with Sky. That and the simple fact that when I left home, my father was with Virgin Media.

 

Maybe I should've also explained that my father is as bent as they come which is why I know he is doing it deliberately. He is using the fact that we have the same name to palm his debts off on me.

 

Funny thing is though, they aren't scribbled out addresses but actually addressed to me in print; which leads me to believe that he has in fact got in contact with the debt companies and told them that the bills were mine and given them my address.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most Councils address their envelopes as not to be redirected but to be returned to Sender. If the OP's father has therefore sent these on as some sort of payback or similar then he himself is going to be found out at some stage, by the look of things very quickly and could land himself in some serious doo-doos.

 

Now may be a good time to let the past go and to try and resolve differences before this gets really messy, not easy I know but someone has to start to offer the olive branch.

 

If you were only 18 when you started receiving these and the family had lived at the same address for a number of years before "supposedly" moving that would mean you would have been responsible for the CT since the age of 5 for example, someone at the Town hall needs to do their maths.

 

PT

 

What are you insuating by saying "supposedly"? I lived at home with my father and moved out when I was 18. Do you think I'm lying? :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's no doubt that he is deliberately trying to confuse the Council/Debt Collectors as some of the bills I've had cannot be confused ... Funny thing is though, they aren't scribbled out addresses but actually addressed to me in print; which leads me to believe that he has in fact got in contact with the debt companies and told them that the bills were mine and given them my address.

 

That's why I asked, rather suspected you might say that :(

 

I am no lawyer. But if there is no love lost between you and, as PT suggests, no olive branch to extend, then perhaps it's a job for the police? Clearly there is - a rather silly - attempt to defraud?

It would be interesting to ask the council when they had a change of address for 'you'...

 

Rae.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's no doubt that he is deliberately trying to confuse the Council/Debt Collectors as some of the bills I've had cannot be confused.

 

For instance, I received debt letters from Virgin Media and the apartment I'm in isn't even wired up for Virgin, which is why I'm with Sky. That and the simple fact that when I left home, my father was with Virgin Media.

 

Maybe I should've also explained that my father is as bent as they come which is why I know he is doing it deliberately. He is using the fact that we have the same name to palm his debts off on me.

 

Funny thing is though, they aren't scribbled out addresses but actually addressed to me in print; which leads me to believe that he has in fact got in contact with the debt companies and told them that the bills were mine and given them my address.

 

Appreciate what you say but if he has had the Virgin account prior to you leaving home at 18 then you probably could never have signed up to them because you would have been too young. One way of doing this is to ask them to compare signatures.

 

You could also make a Statutory Declaration to all this, reason being that if you were telling porkies then you could be done for perjury I believe. Your father by wilfully doing this therefore runs the risk of a Committal Hearing for deliberately evading paying ie won't pay as opposed to can't pay.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What are you insuating by saying "supposedly"? I lived at home with my father and moved out when I was 18. Do you think I'm lying? :confused:

 

No you've picked that up wrong. What I meant by it was that if you were the bill payer that has "supposedly" moved to a new address, whereas he has actually stayed put and is trying to place the debt on the yourself.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's why I asked, rather suspected you might say that :(

 

I am no lawyer. But if there is no love lost between you and, as PT suggests, no olive branch to extend, then perhaps it's a job for the police? Clearly there is - a rather silly - attempt to defraud?

It would be interesting to ask the council when they had a change of address for 'you'...

 

Rae.

 

I've been tempted to report it to the police in the past but as much as I detest him, I don't want to cause anymore family riffs so I'm caught between the proverbial rock...

 

I know it seems rather silly but the combined amount of all the debts forwarded to me runs into the thousands.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's why I asked, rather suspected you might say that :(

 

I am no lawyer. But if there is no love lost between you and, as PT suggests, no olive branch to extend, then perhaps it's a job for the police? Clearly there is - a rather silly - attempt to defraud?

It would be interesting to ask the council when they had a change of address for 'you'...

 

Rae.

 

Hi Rae

 

I think in this day and age it may be termed Identity Theft.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No you've picked that up wrong. What I meant by it was that if you were the bill payer that has "supposedly" moved to a new address, whereas he has actually stayed put and is trying to place the debt on the yourself.

 

PT

 

OK sorry, I undersand what you're saying now! Something's surely amiss for them to even send me the bill in the first place when they know full well that he still lives there.

 

Saying that though, it's been so long since I heard form/about him that I'm not even sure he still does live there. Though I know he did when the letters started coming to me.

 

Anyway, thanks for all the help/advice, it has been reassuring!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been tempted to report it to the police in the past but as much as I detest him, I don't want to cause anymore family riffs so I'm caught between the proverbial rock...

 

I know it seems rather silly but the combined amount of all the debts forwarded to me runs into the thousands.

 

Is your father on his own or do you have access through other family members. It needs someone to tell him what is happening and the consequences it could have.

 

This appears to have gone on too long and may have serious repercussions for him and you as it could well be viewed that you have known about it for a long time. If there is no one else then maybe you have to do what you to do regardless of distasteful it may be. If not stopped he will just carry on and you will end up carrying the can for him.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...