Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Recommended Posts

Recently received an Enforcement Notice from my local council for the following traffic contravention:

34 Being in a Bus Lane

Date of offence 27 December 2009

 

Date of Notice 02 February 2010

 

28 Days to pay

 

The situation - please bear with me as it is hard to explain the layout of the road.:

 

This is a one way road that has traffic coming off of a dual carriageway, traffic emerging from a roundabout and a tram line that also uses the road all converging into one lane. The single lane leads into this road that leads to the multi storey carpark , at the entrance of the carpark there is a filter lane to the left that allows you to drive back round the one way system , there is a tram running alongside, also used as a bus lane. The buses and trams carry on up the road not turning off.

 

I found myself in this absolutely huge congested road on the 27th Dec (sales were on) I was in the lane going towards the carpark, having been in this queue for an exceptional long time (bearing in mind I ws not entering the carpark) as most cars were waiting for entry into the carpark. There was absolutely no trams or buses blocking or in sight - I like the other vehicles previously pulled into the left hand lane that led into the no carpark filter lane so as I could continue my journey forward.

 

Is there a time limit on issuing the enforcement notice? or is there a case to appeal? -

Halifax Card (OH) -2.9% reinstated - Sucess!

Santander/House of Fraser (1) PPI Refund plus 8% plus LOC

Santander/House of Fraser (2) PPI Refunded plus 8% plus LOC

Penalty Charge Notice - Representation accepted and PN cancelled - £120

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once you enter the bus lane you have commited the offence there is no time limit. The only way as I see it you can appeal is:

 

1. There was inadaqute signing to say buses only.

2. You where directed into the lane by a Policeman.

3. You entered the lane to pass an accident or broken down vechicle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You entered the bus lane, congestion is not an excuse for this.

 

Your only get out IMO is if the bus lane is unenforceable generally (i.e. signage) as opposed to due to specific circumstances.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once you enter the bus lane you have commited the offence there is no time limit.

 

The regulations contradict you on this (my bold)

 

The Bus Lane Contraventions (Penalty Charges, Adjudication and Enforcement) (England) Regulations 2005

 

Penalty charge notices

8. —(1) Where an approved local authority have reason to believe that a penalty charge is payable under Part 2 with respect to a vehicle, they may, in accordance with paragraphs (2) and (5) below, serve a notice ("penalty charge notice") on the person appearing to them to be the owner of the vehicle or on the person appearing to them to be the person liable to pay the charge.

 

(2) Subject to paragraph (3), a penalty charge notice shall be served before the end of the period of 28 days beginning with the detection date.

 

(3) Where—

 

 

(a) within 14 days of the detection date an approved local authority have made a request to the Secretary of State for the supply of relevant particulars; and

 

(b) those particulars have not been supplied before the date after which the authority would not be entitled to serve a penalty charge notice by virtue of paragraph (2),

 

the authority shall continue to be entitled to serve a penalty charge notice for a further period of six months beginning with the date mentioned in sub-paragraph (b).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there a time limit on issuing the enforcement notice? or is there a case to appeal? -

 

28 days to issue the PCN unless they can justify why this time limit was exceeded.

 

eg is it a lease car where the RK is a company? Is it a company car so they wrote to your company first but were then referred on to you?

 

Are you correctly recorded as the RK with the DVLA at your current address? if so then you may have grounds for "procedural impropriatety"

Link to post
Share on other sites

The regulations contradict you on this (my bold)

 

The Bus Lane Contraventions (Penalty Charges, Adjudication and Enforcement) (England) Regulations 2005

 

 

I meant there is no time limit in the bus lane.You do not have to be in it for a certain length of time once you enter it the offence has been comitted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

28 days to issue the PCN unless they can justify why this time limit was exceeded.

 

eg is it a lease car where the RK is a company? Is it a company car so they wrote to your company first but were then referred on to you?

 

Are you correctly recorded as the RK with the DVLA at your current address? if so then you may have grounds for "procedural impropriatety"

 

Yes RK - can you elaborate more on "procedural impropriatety"

 

Thank you all for taking the time - much appreciated

Halifax Card (OH) -2.9% reinstated - Sucess!

Santander/House of Fraser (1) PPI Refund plus 8% plus LOC

Santander/House of Fraser (2) PPI Refunded plus 8% plus LOC

Penalty Charge Notice - Representation accepted and PN cancelled - £120

Link to post
Share on other sites

If there is no valid reason for them not to have issued the PCN to the RK, who is correctly recorded as such on the DVLA systems, has been the RK for a sufficient length of time and has not moved house so there is no doubt that the DVLA record was correct when they applied for your details, then there has been a procedural error by not issuing it within 28 days.

 

The option reasons to dispute on the back of the PCN should have an option of "Procedural Impropriately" which covers this situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If there is no valid reason for them not to have issued the PCN to the RK, who is correctly recorded as such on the DVLA systems, has been the RK for a sufficient length of time and has not moved house so there is no doubt that the DVLA record was correct when they applied for your details, then there has been a procedural error by not issuing it within 28 days.

 

The option reasons to dispute on the back of the PCN should have an option of "Procedural Impropriately" which covers this situation.

 

 

Will check this out - thx

Halifax Card (OH) -2.9% reinstated - Sucess!

Santander/House of Fraser (1) PPI Refund plus 8% plus LOC

Santander/House of Fraser (2) PPI Refunded plus 8% plus LOC

Penalty Charge Notice - Representation accepted and PN cancelled - £120

Link to post
Share on other sites

28 days to issue the PCN unless they can justify why this time limit was exceeded.

 

eg is it a lease car where the RK is a company? Is it a company car so they wrote to your company first but were then referred on to you?

 

Are you correctly recorded as the RK with the DVLA at your current address? if so then you may have grounds for "procedural impropriatety"

 

 

Does this still apply if a Local Council have issued the enforcement notice?

Halifax Card (OH) -2.9% reinstated - Sucess!

Santander/House of Fraser (1) PPI Refund plus 8% plus LOC

Santander/House of Fraser (2) PPI Refunded plus 8% plus LOC

Penalty Charge Notice - Representation accepted and PN cancelled - £120

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just been back down the road and taken photos to substantiate my appeal - apart from a sign indicating "one way" back at the start of the road where the traffic lights are there is no other signs - so once you have entered the road - the bus lane does not have different colour tarmac - as you approach the carpark there is road markings stating two laneS "CAR PARK" and "AHEAD ONLY". During busy periods the traffic leading to the carpark is bumper to bumper therefore you cannot see any of the words under the cars !!!

Halifax Card (OH) -2.9% reinstated - Sucess!

Santander/House of Fraser (1) PPI Refund plus 8% plus LOC

Santander/House of Fraser (2) PPI Refunded plus 8% plus LOC

Penalty Charge Notice - Representation accepted and PN cancelled - £120

Link to post
Share on other sites

for advice and pictures of bus lanes go to tickty fighter

 

Thanks for the pointer - it confirmed the 28 days to issue the penalty

Halifax Card (OH) -2.9% reinstated - Sucess!

Santander/House of Fraser (1) PPI Refund plus 8% plus LOC

Santander/House of Fraser (2) PPI Refunded plus 8% plus LOC

Penalty Charge Notice - Representation accepted and PN cancelled - £120

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone have a template letter for a appeal with regardt o the 28 day - I have it all going onin my head but not good at putting it in words - would like to to sound more official and informed!;)

Halifax Card (OH) -2.9% reinstated - Sucess!

Santander/House of Fraser (1) PPI Refund plus 8% plus LOC

Santander/House of Fraser (2) PPI Refunded plus 8% plus LOC

Penalty Charge Notice - Representation accepted and PN cancelled - £120

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Wording I used on the Details box was:

 

"From the date of the alleged offence taking place XXXXX and the date of the Notice of Enforcement XXXXXX plus receipt of the notice XXXXXXXX to the registered keeper of the vehicle, the time elapsed over 28 days of the alleged offence I believe it is unfair and prejudice to me and would render and proceedings against me to be unfair."

 

REceived a letter yesterday fromthe council - my representation made has been accepted and the Penalty Charge CANCELLED!

 

THANK YOU TO ALL WHO POINTED ME IN THE RIGHT DIRECTIN AND GAVE ADVICE :D:D:D:D

Halifax Card (OH) -2.9% reinstated - Sucess!

Santander/House of Fraser (1) PPI Refund plus 8% plus LOC

Santander/House of Fraser (2) PPI Refunded plus 8% plus LOC

Penalty Charge Notice - Representation accepted and PN cancelled - £120

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Good to hear the outcome.

 

I've read your thread and would pass the following comments;

 

Obviously its academic now, but from the way you described the circumstances, I would of thought that if your progress was being impeded by cars queing for a carpark (which is an offence in itself if they are obstructing the normal flow of traffic) and your only option were to use the bus lane, then I would have used that as mitigating circumstances. It happened to me a number of years back in Wolverhampton and it was also thown out at the appeal stage for these very reasons. It would of been interesting to take a look on Google Street View and check this but obviously it dosn't matter now.

 

__________________

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my scales at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice usefull.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wording I used on the Details box was:

 

"From the date of the alleged offence taking place XXXXX and the date of the Notice of Enforcement XXXXXX plus receipt of the notice XXXXXXXX to the registered keeper of the vehicle, the time elapsed over 28 days of the alleged offence I believe it is unfair and prejudice to me and would render and proceedings against me to be unfair."

 

REceived a letter yesterday fromthe council - my representation made has been accepted and the Penalty Charge CANCELLED!

 

THANK YOU TO ALL WHO POINTED ME IN THE RIGHT DIRECTIN AND GAVE ADVICE :D:D:D:D

 

The enforcement notice is the second notice you get after the PCN there is no 28 day limit for the enforcement notice, so I suspect something else was the reason the PCN was cancelled, still a good result for you though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...