Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Recommended Posts

Hi , i have been contacted for the past few months by a debt recovery company regarding a supposed bill for just over £250.00 for a contract rental and calls from 4 years ago. I have NEVER had a contract phone, and always had o2 pay and go and now vodaphone, however they claim that i had taken out this so called samsung phone via the internet, using my details, name, address, date of birth etc. I contacted the company over 2 years ago to state that it was not me and that someone had obviously fraudulently had the phone..they said that they would look into it but never did, (( i dont even own nor ever have had a phone they say i had on contract)) they stated that its my details so my responsibility, now the letters have gotten more threatening, saying that they will take me to court. I have been sending the letters back unopened as return to sender and writing please stop sending on the envelope too.. is there anything i can do ?? i am on my witts end,, please can someone give me advice and help me on this matter ?? many thanks in advance :-?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Marking letters as return to sender isn't going to work; if anything it will make the debt collection agency think they probably do have the right person.

 

You need to write a letter to the agency which makes it clear that

 

1. The debt is not yours.

2. You completely refute that you owe the money.

3. They must stop harrassing you.

 

Do not include your phone number in the letter.

 

You cannot be made to pay for a debt you do not have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't need to prove that you did not. They have to prove that you did. You simply need to refute the allegation. Include in your letter the contact you had 2 years ago (e.g. you contacted them promptly when you were made aware) which reinforces your position.

 

Then it's up to them to go away and prove it. In the meantime you might like to check your credit history to see if it has been entered on there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...