Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Recommended Posts

please can someone advise me as im at my wits end over the scumbags that are welcome finance.......i brought a car from 'ukcarcredit' in 2003 with finance provided by welcome for £10283....they then added on 'insurance premiums advanced £690 totaling £10900+......the car broke down within a week and was nothing but problem after problem......tried getting it repaird under the 'mechanical brakedown insurance they said i had to take out but this could never be claimed on as the car 'never had a full serivce history !!...i finally 'scrapped' the car for £300 in 2004......in 0ctober 2004 i was struggling financially and could not afford the £228 monthly repayments and asked welcome if they could be reduced until i got back on my feet so to say...they insisted on me refinancing the agreement which like a fool i did but as i was suffering frrom depression at the time i just wanted to resolve the matter quickly.....anyhows my 'debt to them then skyrised to £11380 at £135 per month ....since then ive kept regularly to these payments but admit some 'missed' ones due to financial difficulties at times but 95% of the time i pay £140 per month instead of £135....welcome never ever sent me an account statement unless i asked them for one but would always badger me with phone calls and letters as i had cancelled my direct debt mandate with them after they continually tried to take money from my account before the agreed date...one bank holiday 'swiping' £660 from my account 'due to error' . ...so since the ive gone into the local branch each month to pay in person....my health and mindset have improved over the last year or so and im devastated how much this con artists are riping me off still....i demanded an up to date statement and list of all charges/ fees on my account and am dismayed to find they claim i still owe them £4800+.....they have added over £1000 in 'Charges' to my account which i am refusing to pay.....more recently to my horror every month i pay the £140 they have been deducting on average £28 for capitalisation/hpdi fee n fee assessment???? what the hell is that for please???....i am close to not paying them at all hoping the matter ends in court as i still say the car they 'financed' was in contravene of the 'sale of goods act'..........they still badger me with phone calls every month even though ive written to them countless times informing them i personally visit the local office each month with cash payment .....also they charge me £10 for each phone call they make.....can they legally do this ???.....can some one kindly give me any advise......many thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mark, seems to me that you need to send them a subject access request which will show a complete record of transactions including phone call charges and a print out of what has gone on behind the scenes. Also you need to send them a CCA which will provide you with copies of your agreements. Cost is £10 for SAR and £1 for the CCA. The charges are excessive and you should be able to claim them back. They cannot properly justify £10 for a phone call and indeed they are required to inform you in writing every time they make any charge so that it can be paid, not just add it to the contract and extract interest on those charges. Lets face it, after some time you would not know whether these charges are real or invented. Others more knowledagable here will be able to help more I'm sure. Post up on here your agreements when you have them less personal details of course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for replying james....reading the problems people have with welcome makes my blood boil that they arent more accountable in this country.....im not very computer literate and dont know how to 'post' up my agreements but i did get a rather 'confusing' copy i requested last year but my 'signature' is no where to be seen on it????....i still maintain when i refinanced the loan the total amount on the agreement they sent me was much higher than the quote from the women who did the loan in the local office(romford)....????.....plus can they legally keep phoning my place of work to contact me???....ive sent them the 'phone call harrasment letter' previously as ive wrote to them more than once explaiing i personally visit the office on the last friday or saturday of each month.....yet they still continually phone me!! thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you can report them to the infomation commissioner when they take no notice of your request, especially phoning at work. Maybe someone can jump in and offer better direction on this point. Dont forget that every time they call you there is another 10 quid added to your account, its another con to squeeze cash out of you. I would be writing again and stating that you accept no liability for these calls and any charges levied to date need to be refunded with the interest which has been added. Give them a final warning and threaten that any further calls espeacially at work and you will report them to the relevant authorities. Dont forget to send any complaint letters by recorded post and send to compliance in Nottingham with a copy to your branch manager. Meanwhile see what comes up from other guys on here.

By the way you should have legally received a statment each year from 2008 its law. Demand it

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the advise james......welcome have 'never' sent me any statements volunteerally only whe ive requested one???.....ive requested all correspondence to be in 'writing' but they still phone so each time they are 'charging' me a £10 fee?.....can this be legal???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...