Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Recommended Posts

My friend purchased a small oak bookshelf from M&S which was £350.00 it was delivered before christmas, the delivery people were late despite M&S phoning saying that they would be there at a specific time, my friend signed for the delivery. He did not inspected the bookshelf very closely and left home for 10 days to visit a sick relative.

 

When he returned he looked the bookshelf and saw unsightly marks the front of the top shelf and one of the side panels had making on other side of which was not on the other side. He phoned M&S immedately and after a lengtly concerdation with manager at store where it was purchased they said that they would have to send some one out to inspect the item and they would be in contact.

 

Yesterday a person called from M&S to make the inspections he took photos and said that my friend was lucky to have these marking as if he went into an antique shop he would have to pay a premium for these unsightly markings. My friend said that the bookself was only just purcahsed and not a 100years old.

 

This person from M&S also made a report which my friend would sign as it said that it was not a defect. He also told my friend that in the M&S store all bookshelf furniture are like whcih of course it not correct as my friend went to the store to check them out no marks whatsoever.

 

Is there anything my friend can do about these marks on the item he purchased and can he insits that the take it back or replace it with another one without these markings on it.:mad2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi doggie

 

Your friend can do Chargeback, if purchased by Credit Card :-http://www.which.co.uk/consumer-rights/sale-of-goods/your-rights-when-paying-by-credit-card/chargeback-on-credit-and-debit-cards/

 

or

 

Get a refund under SOGA, there are templates there, he shouldn't have signed the paperwork, however it doesn't matter :-

http://www.consumerdirect.gov.uk/after_you_buy/know-your-rights/furniture/

 

Send any letters Recorded.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for links, I will called in to see them next week. I just foud a website called the reviewcentre and I wish I had seen it before I went to M&S store for furniture. There are many very unhappy customers of M&S. I will never ever buy furniture from M&S again. I think I am going to have an uphil struggle with them from now on, which I would never envisage having to do with M&S furniture as I was under the impression that they had a good after sale service. HOW WRONG WAS I.......

Link to post
Share on other sites

M&S will charge you £100 if an order that has been placed with them and the order is cancelled.

 

The furniture that M&S sends to customers is not the same or in good condition that they display in store floor.

 

M&S T&C tha tehy give you after you have paid says that an outside organisation will deal with any dispute and the customer will need to go through their outside organisation and not with M&S that has taken your money.

 

M&S will not go against the outside organisation instructions regardless how rubbish they say in their report. M&S has your money and they will not let you have it back. .....beware M&S trades on their name, not on the rubbish they sell to customers. :evil:

Edited by DJ2010
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...