Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Recommended Posts

The provisions of the CCA say that a creditor commits an offence if he fails to comply after a set period of time.

 

Hillesden Securities have been writing to me since 2008 saying they're in the process of getting the CCA information from Egg. If they've committed an offence, what action can I take and can I get the debt cancelled?

 

Can anyone tell me what my options are now?

 

Thanks,

 

Dave

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ddelo

 

You can't get the debt written off, it would be foolish to try as recent cases have shown. Have you sent off an account in dispute letter? If you haven't then thats the thing to do. The account will remain in dispute until they provide the requested documents. The debt is Unenforceable until the documents are produced.

 

Heres an interesting read:- http://www.oft.gov.uk/about-the-oft/legal-powers/legal/cca/unenforceable-credit-agreements

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/OFT1272.pdf

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Several of my (alleged - as they haven't yet proven I owe them anything) creditors have now failed to provide the CCA information. I've sent them the Account in Dispute letter. Hillesden securities have continued to send me their regular (it's on hold while we find the information) letter. Westcot Securities keep telling me to write to RBS, despite my telling them that it their obligation to do so. All 12+2 time limits have well and truly expired.

 

What next? Despite their all having failed to comply, been told the account's in dispute, they're carrying on as though none that counts!

 

I would be grateful for further advice and directions to the next letter template.

 

Thanks for the help this forum provides - it is SUCH a psychological crutch knowing there's impartial advice out there.

 

Dave B

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi FS.

 

Capital One sent a copy of the current T&Cs via an undated letter in response to my CCA request to FPC Debt Collection Services. My CCA request to FPC was dated 15/12/2010. FPC last wrote on 06/01/2011 saying account on hold while they refer the matter to their client (Capital One).

 

None of the others has attempted this yet, tho one DCA (Moorcroft) quoted some legal cases in a letter before they then wrote they were no longer on the case. Westcot Credit Services seem to have taken this one over for NatWest/RBS.

 

Barclays have been pursuing their debt via multiple DCAs simultaneously: CDCS & CSL (with a threatened doorstep visit by Power2Contact). I sent CDCS the Account in Dispute letter and now Barclays are asking me for information because they can't find any record of the debt CDCS is pursuing! CSL kept telephoning me & leaving automated messages. I sent them the "stop harassing me by phone" letter & they've agreed to de-list my number but have requested settlement of the alleged debt. I'm sending their CCA request letter in the morning, tho if CDCS can't comply I would doubt CSL can.

 

The other one is Hillesden Securities acting on behalf of Egg. They just keep sending me a letter saying the account is on hold while they look for the documents, even after I sent them the Account in Dispute. I've been getting this same letter every 21 days for almost 3 years!

 

So really, they're all at the same stage. None seems to be able to comply with the CCA request, but all continue to press for settlement of a debt they can't prove. And not one of them has produced any evidence they have either taken over the debt or are acting on behalf of the original creditor. It seems just because they send you a letter you're supposed to take their word for it! I even wrote to Westcot saying I wasn't attempting to avoid any liabilities, I was just asking them to produce proper evidence that they are authorised to collect it and what the amount is. Their response was to say their client requires me to wrote to them myself with the £1 that they had already returned several letters previous.

 

Is there a way to halt this groundhog day?

 

Thanks,

Dave

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just keep the letters mark down the date yo received them on the envelopes and file them under ignore.

 

Give a dog a bone and it will keep coming back, so no more letters to any of them, you have done and said what you have to say, if they fail to read your letters then reciprocate the favour and ignore them also.

 

If anyone of these so called doorstep collectors does in fact exist, and grace you with their slimy presence then, take control, it is your property, you choose who you want to talk to on the doorstep, as do you on the phone.

 

They are all powerless to act, powerless to do anything, the letters are purely and intentionally designed to psychologically intimidate and threaten you, "in YOUR own home"! Once you realise this then their puerile missives fail to have any meaning or effect and renders them completely useless and pointless, they are a waste of paper.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...