Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Recommended Posts

Morning everyone,

I received a letter (first letter) from Capquest at the weekend with regards to an old credit card informing me that despite continued attempts to get in contact with me they will be looking to start legal action.

I presume this is one of their usual threat-a-grams, letter before action full of IFS and MAYS and presuming the court will award them whatever they want. Then goes into depth about bailiffs and how they work. I have until 26th of this month till they pass it on to their solicitors who MAY commence legal proceedings.

Also the pre-litigations department will perform the relevant validations and checks. Shouldn't they do this first? lol

Ok so apart from giving me a laugh at the weekend reading this (thanks to CAG for the education) this account is definitely statue barred. I haven't paid or acknowledged this debt for at least 6 years. 2005 was a significant year for me so I know I haven't paid anything since at least the end of 2004, probably longer!

When I checked all 3 credit files in November 2010 this wasn't showing on any, I have checked again this morning on Experian and it's still clear.

So should I go straight in for the Statue Barred letter?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

So should I go straight in for the Statue Barred letter?

 

NO. I would send the 'prove it' letter first and when (if) they manage to come back with anything CCA them.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?609-Can-t-find-the-letter-you-want-Look-here

 

This route is just to make sure that it is SB before hitting them. You don't want to go off half cocked

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Morning everyone, update time.

I emailed capquest the Prove It letter and received the following letter yesterday as a response.

Dear Mr Xboxer

Debt Purchased From: Capital One Bank (Europe) plc

Account Number: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Balance: £xxx.xx

Further to your recent correspondence and in order to process your communication further, we would request you provide the following information by XX Feb 11 to assist us in resolving this matter.

Proof of residence as at xx xx 2003, ie.; a copy of a Utility Bill or Bank Statement covering this date.

Proof of Identity (i.e. A photocopy of Driving Licence, Identity Card or Passport) would assist us to progress the account accordingly.

Please confirm if you have ever lived at: xx xx xx, xx.

Your assistance would be greatly appreciated. Please note this is not a demand but a request.

Yours sincerely

Collections Administration

From the info in the letter it is me they are looking for.

So apart from the fact it was sent second class (obviously not urgent) and the fact they wanted to show off their word skills (the three actions were boxed and had tick marks next to them :-)), should I reply or ignore?

If I reply I will NOT be supplying any of the requested information as the way I see it they should have been certain of this before the initial letter.

Thanks as always in advance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's against the OFT Guidelines for them to ask for clarification and as you quite rightly imply if they weren't sure of who you were they shouldn't have written

 

It's up to them to get the proof so make them work

 

Good luck

 

R

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] I asked them to wait whilst I got my Bank card :violin:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Information that may help if a CCA request is refused due to the lack of a signature . . http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?248863-Signature-demands-fight-back-possible-!&highlight=

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I'll wait until their next letter then! :-)

Right so I'm expecting this to turn into a full game of letter tennis as this is only my second letter. I'm going to be requesting NoA, CCA, statements and breakdowns (all separately of course)

As I'm 100% certain this is SB I want to make this last just to be sure.

So out of interest does anyone know what Cap One's terms were in 2003/04 with regards to accrual of a cause of action?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You MUST send a copy of that puerile inept letter to the OFT&TS that is classic, confirmation that they are indeed in breach of the OFT DCguidelines and after the blinkered view on Radio 2 the other day, complain to the CSA also.

http://www.csaconsumers-uk.com/page/i-have-a-complaint

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bazooka Boo, as soon as I know it is definitely SB I will be firing off the complaint!

The way I see it is that they want to know where I was living on quite a specific date. Is that because they don't know for definite that I'm who they are after OR want to make sure their paperwork will match?

The problem is I know of 2 other people in the town where I live with the same name as me and there is even someone in the neighbouring county with the same name and DOB as me ( I found out this by accident when I was admitted to hospital a couple of years ago). So any of my namesakes could have received similar letters and my details!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The way I see it is that they want to know where I was living on quite a specific date. Is that because they don't know for definite that I'm who they are after OR want to make sure their paperwork will match?

 

That is exactly what they have done, a blanket bomb approach in the deluded hope that one of those letters will end up with the correct person, you only need complain to the OFT&TS, and the CSA, and what the hell, your Local MP also, get this corrupt rotten to the core industry back into the commons for debate!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...