Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

    • good evening guys lookinforinfo many thanks for your reply and support. Thanks for getting the team to move the posts to a MSG thread. I wanted to avoid any confrontation but i feel helpless against these evil  morons, i should not have to fight it and hope the court sees things in my favour, its the whole process that makes me want to kill somebody, i wont but im not always in control of my actions due to my  mental health condition.   All going well i wont hear from the police but who knows, ill just have to wait and see, the morons deserved it but i did not go there to cause agro, i was held in an impossible situation. I have told doctors many times i might end up in jail or kill someone or kill myself.    FTMDave thanks for your reply i will let you guys know if i hear anything.   ------------------------- Today i called Citizens Advice and told them everything including my vulnerabilities, i have a phone appointment on the 22nd to discuss the illegal PCN. Im not sure what they can do but ill see if my vulnerabilities help in any way  
    • Sorry I was just editing because I didn't seee your first reply. My bad sorry and yeah 70% criminology and 30% counselling, just give me more options when I graduate. Victim support etc.. ho ironic lol 😆 
    • No particular relevance – but always interested to know what university students are studying. I have known lots of criminology students – but I have never heard of a degree which involves criminology plus counselling. I hope it works well for you. What about the answers to the rest of the questions?
    • Yes im going to university in September studying criminology with counselling, everything you have said is correct. I have the voice recording of me asking him for a breakdown of what the £500 would be, then he offers me the new deal of straight swap oth the £200 service cost all recorded. I extended the warranty from 3 month to 12 month on his advice. The company is called handler protect and it was an extra £100. The warranty declined as they said it is due to age and not a sudden failure apparently.  Im unsure what you mean by a letter of rejection. I have sent a formal letter requesting a replacement or a refund on the advice CAB. That was sent on the 13th June.  And yes i paid for the original diagnostic from another reputable garage.  Hope this helps and thank you 😊 
    • Dx no matter how long I live and how much more I learn in the meantime I will never be able to match your level of subtlety.🙂
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Recommended Posts

Please help I need to get a ccj set aside and don't know where to start the ccj is for £278 original loan was 150 + 1 mth int at 36 totaling 186 the other charges are 31.00 for contact 15.00 declined payment attempts 20.00 issue of default notice and a further 36.00 for another mths interest I have apparently paid 35.00 the final 25.00 is for court charge. I never received a default so asked for a copy they sent this advised it was issued by 2nd class post on the 14th may ( this is the date on top of it) the payby date is the 28th so 14 days in total given as appossed to 14 + 4 for delivery would this be a good enough reason to get ccj set aside

Link to post
Share on other sites

The loan was taken out in march Apparently of which I'm waiting for a bank statement to prove this coz I actually believe I took a 100 out in jan and they rolled it over for 3 mths I was upto my eyeballs in it last yr as got married and things got out of hand ccj was sent on 9th July I wasn't aware I had it until after the time scale as I was so busy n stressed at the time I threw my post to one side to prevent even more stress.... Wrong n stupid I know but have opened my eyes now and am sorting out all my debts and really need to get my ccj removed so I can get a mortgage

Link to post
Share on other sites

The loan agreement which they have sent is for one mth 26/03/2010 to be paid on 22/04/2010 duration of agreement maximum 29days this agreement hadn't electronic signed name and address with a date of June 2010

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you were issued with the notice it will have had a tick box - I ACCEPT ALL - I DENY ALL - I ACCEPT PART, did you tick any of these?

If you feel it was wrongly entered you can apply to the issuing court to have it removed at a cost of about £40 but this is no guarantee it will be removed.

The loan agreement which they have sent is for one mth 26/03/2010 to be paid on 22/04/2010 duration of agreement maximum 29days this agreement hadn't electronic signed name and address with a date of June 2010
Link to post
Share on other sites

When you were issued with the notice it will have had a tick box - I ACCEPT ALL - I DENY ALL - I ACCEPT PART, did you tick any of these?

If you feel it was wrongly entered you can apply to the issuing court to have it removed at a cost of about £40 but this is no guarantee it will be removed.

 

I didnt tick any I didn't even know I had Form until it was to late so didn't return it or acknowledge it if I was to complete a n244 on the basis of disputing part charges and an incorrect default notice would it be set aside on this basis

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posts moved to a new thread.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didnt tick any I didn't even know I had Form until it was to late so didn't return it or acknowledge it if I was to complete a n244 on the basis of disputing part charges and an incorrect default notice would it be set aside on this basis

Bump

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want the judgement set aside you will need to apply using an N244, and if that's allowed then the original claim will be re-instated and you'll have the opportunity to fight it.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want the judgement set aside you will need to apply using an N244, and if that's allowed then the original claim will be re-instated and you'll have the opportunity to fight it.

Thanks Cairo but would the fact that the default notice was issued incorrectly and the fact I dispute part of the charges be enough to set this aside if so how would I word it to include legal jargon

Link to post
Share on other sites

A set aside application is just to get the judgment set aside. If that happens then the claim is re-instated, and then the case would be heard and you would put in your defence along the lines of what you've said here.

 

If you received all the paperwork to do with the case you'll need to say why you didn't deal with it at the time. If you didn't get it that should be a good enough reason to give you another chance to deal with it.

 

All this could be quite risky because if you lose you might have costs awarded against you.

 

I'm wondering if you might be better off simply claiming back your charges, including removal of the default. This would be a small claim which means you each cover your costs, but removal of defaults is not easy. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?72-Data-Protection-and-Default-Issues

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

knock up a SOC to reclaim the charges and compound them at their int rate too

put that inyour court pack/poc

 

i eould not argue too much on the dn issue though, point it out, but most dn issues are now irrelevent thanks to the likes of rankines judgement

 

from another thread:

Yes you can set aside
link3.gif
a CCJ and counterclaim for charges.
You can issue a counter-claim by completing the counterclaim section of Defence Form (N9B) if you think you are owed money by the claimant that could offset some or all of the claim and
don't forget the interest
link3.gif
also.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...