Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

I received a Claim Form from CL Finance Limited and I need urgent help please.

The alleged debt was originally owned by NATWEST Credit Card and was sold to them. I received the court papers three days ago and I am not sure of what to do.CL had initially secured Default Judgement on the same debt before but I managed to get it set aside as I had not received the court papers. The Judge ordered them to file a new claim and provide me with defence pack.

Now they have issued the Claim Form with a copy of CCA. I would also very much appreciate if some one could have a look at the CCA and advice me. Attached is the Claim form and CCA.

Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

What reason did the judge set aside the ccj before on the last clain

 

Thanks postggj, Yes, it was both CCJ and Charge Order. They secured a CCJ in 2008 then followed by charge order. When made the Set aside application because I had not received the claim form, both were CCJ and CO were set aside.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When was the agreement taken out? Was it an online application?

Morning and thanks cymruambyth,

It was signed in a branch, but all they are supplied now is what I posted depite requesting for a copy of the CCA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

cymruambyth,

I failed to get any information in relation to when the agreement was signed but very sure that it was before 2005. The statements sent buy NATWEST only covered from 2004, but had a balance brought forward from the previuos statement. Therefore, there must have been other statements before that one.

I did make SAR to NATWEST and they only provided me with statement covering 6 years. They stated that the rest they are unable to obtain from their system.

They confirmed that they are unable to obtain the original application form and went on to say that they have not provided copies of the T&C /Notice of Variations as these fall outside the defination of personal Data Protection Act 1998. That section 7(1) © only requires the Data controller to provide a copy of the information constituiting any personal Data but not actual document on which the personal data is recorded.

No DN or Termination were provided.

But as for CL Finance, they have not provided anything apart from the attched doc despite making both CCA and SAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning,

 

It was signed in a branch, but all they are supplied now is what I posted depite requesting for a copy of the CCA.

 

They refer to in the claim a regulated credit agreement. They must provide a True copy of your original, dated & signed. The attached document is NOT the agreement they refer to and can rely upon to enforce the claim.

 

They say the Default notice and Notice of Assignment & Natwests letter are all attached with the claim. Are they ?

 

You must send HC a CPR 31.14 request.

 

Debs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning,

 

 

 

They refer to in the claim a regulated credit agreement. They must provide a True copy of your original, dated & signed. The attached document is NOT the agreement they refer to and can rely upon to enforce the claim.

 

They say the Default notice and Notice of Assignment & Natwests letter are all attached with the claim. Are they ?

 

You must send HC a CPR 31.14 request.

 

Debs

Hi and thanks Debs,

No, all they provided are the documents I posted. How do I go about with the CPR31.14?

Any help or guidance?

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The PoC is a shambles. They claim the sum due is for an agreement made between you and the claimant. It is not.

 

You must demand the NoA, sight of the deed of assignment, the DN and the NatWest letter.

 

So no application form that you have signed? Just a s78 recon? The T&Cs, according to Carey (which they appear to be relying on here) MUST have been present when you signed the agreement.

 

Do you recall what happened when you were in the branch? Were you provided with T&Cs at the time?

 

I think if you signed in branch, you would not be subject to distance selling regs and (possibly) there would have been no right to cancel – which means the T&Cs may be wrong.

 

When did you take out the card? If you have any of your first statements, that could be useful for seeing if the interest rates quoted match those on the T&Cs. The T&Cs they have sent are all over the place. I can’t work out what’s what – looks like three different incomplete sets!

 

What is the date on the claim? You need to issue a CPR 31.14 request urgently for the missing documents.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The PoC is a shambles. They claim the sum due is for an agreement made between you and the claimant. It is not.

 

You must demand the NoA, sight of the deed of assignment, the DN and the NatWest letter.

 

So no application form that you have signed? Just a s78 recon? The T&Cs, according to Carey (which they appear to be relying on here) MUST have been present when you signed the agreement.

 

Do you recall what happened when you were in the branch? Were you provided with T&Cs at the time?

 

I think if you signed in branch, you would not be subject to distance selling regs and (possibly) there would have been no right to cancel – which means the T&Cs may be wrong.

 

When did you take out the card? If you have any of your first statements, that could be useful for seeing if the interest rates quoted match those on the T&Cs. The T&Cs they have sent are all over the place. I can’t work out what’s what – looks like three different incomplete sets!

 

What is the date on the claim? You need to issue a CPR 31.14 request urgently for the missing documents.

Hi DonkeyB,

 

Thanks for your response.

 

No, they have not provided signed application. TGHough its been a while from the time I obtained the card, I recall that I sgned an application.

Initially it was two cards account, Visa and Mater card (Natwest Dual) with two separate account numbers then later on changed to one.

I can not recall well if I was provided with the T&C in the branch.

I tried to look for the statements but could not fid anything before 2004but as I mentioned earlier on it had ballance carried forward from the previous month.

I think the account dates back between 2000 to 2003. I am sorry that I have not got the actual year or information on when exactly the account was opened.

Looking at the T&C provided, yes I think you are right. It looks like its made up of a few different sets.

The Claim form is not dated but posted special delivey ( next day). I recieved it on 10.02.11.It was issued without the response pack.

I looked through my papapers again, they attached NoA and a letter from NATWEST.

See attachment for details.

 

You are very right that their plea (PoC) is wrong. The Judge who Heard the Set Aside Hearing, Pointed that out too and they were given permission to amend but to my suprise they have come back with the same claim.I have also uploaded the order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

... and they have not complied with the order. Check with the court to see if the claim has actually been lodged (though how do you know where it was lodged? D’oh!). I think an instant strike out would be good!

No they haven't. The order was that they should provide me with a defence pack I do not know if what they provided is the defence pack.

They werealso given permission to amend their PoC as youmight have seen in the Order.

Now what is the next move? Any suggestion?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you delete it? Sorry, just that you blanked everything else out differently.

Sorry, I am doing so many things at the same time. I am also due to travel this evening and I am so much under presure.

I did not blank the Seal but I noticed that its not showing in the uploaded one. I do not know what happened. But the original has a court stamp on it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...