Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

    • good evening guys lookinforinfo many thanks for your reply and support. Thanks for getting the team to move the posts to a MSG thread. I wanted to avoid any confrontation but i feel helpless against these evil  morons, i should not have to fight it and hope the court sees things in my favour, its the whole process that makes me want to kill somebody, i wont but im not always in control of my actions due to my  mental health condition.   All going well i wont hear from the police but who knows, ill just have to wait and see, the morons deserved it but i did not go there to cause agro, i was held in an impossible situation. I have told doctors many times i might end up in jail or kill someone or kill myself.    FTMDave thanks for your reply i will let you guys know if i hear anything.   ------------------------- Today i called Citizens Advice and told them everything including my vulnerabilities, i have a phone appointment on the 22nd to discuss the illegal PCN. Im not sure what they can do but ill see if my vulnerabilities help in any way  
    • Sorry I was just editing because I didn't seee your first reply. My bad sorry and yeah 70% criminology and 30% counselling, just give me more options when I graduate. Victim support etc.. ho ironic lol 😆 
    • No particular relevance – but always interested to know what university students are studying. I have known lots of criminology students – but I have never heard of a degree which involves criminology plus counselling. I hope it works well for you. What about the answers to the rest of the questions?
    • Yes im going to university in September studying criminology with counselling, everything you have said is correct. I have the voice recording of me asking him for a breakdown of what the £500 would be, then he offers me the new deal of straight swap oth the £200 service cost all recorded. I extended the warranty from 3 month to 12 month on his advice. The company is called handler protect and it was an extra £100. The warranty declined as they said it is due to age and not a sudden failure apparently.  Im unsure what you mean by a letter of rejection. I have sent a formal letter requesting a replacement or a refund on the advice CAB. That was sent on the 13th June.  And yes i paid for the original diagnostic from another reputable garage.  Hope this helps and thank you 😊 
    • Dx no matter how long I live and how much more I learn in the meantime I will never be able to match your level of subtlety.🙂
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

the missus got a threatogram from these creeps about a month ago trying to collect on a debt that is without doubt now Stat Barred ( weve been together for 6 years and the debt extends 2 years beyond that with no acknowledgement or payment made in that time.)

 

Sent off the usual CCA Request first ( was doing a bit of phishing myself) and now they have sent her 2 seperate sets of T&Cs - one with her previous address nicely printed on the front, and a set with her address from before that.

 

The T&Cs are different and dont worry, I know how to deal with this.

But am wondering if I can cause them any damage as the accompanying letter is threatening County Court, extra charges, Charging Order etc ( the house is in my name only but they wont be told this!).

 

Rather than fire off the Stat Barred letter, I thought I might spend a tenner and SAR them.

It must be an enormous amount of work for them to comply with for the sake of a tenner?

And it may throw some interesting facts up?

 

Is it worth stirring up the nest and causing them a bit of grief when I could simply hit them with the Stat Barred letter?

Was thinking of SAR - ing them in case they try to claim at a later date, that some phantom payment has been made in the last 6 years ( it hasnt - but we all know what these cretins are like).

 

So is it worth stirring it up when she has the final solution of Stat Barred?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, although I, like you would be very tempted to cause them maximum trouble, I too would recomend not to go down that path.

 

With Statute Barred debts, the debt still exists beyond the SB date and they can continue to press for payment, however, once you have told them that you will not be paying any thing, ever, on this account then they must abide by the rules and cease all collection activity.

 

What can happen as we have been seeing on here is that they just 'hide' this debt amongst thousands of other then sell it on lower down the chain and you may then get the lowest of the low chasing again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys, yes I know where you are coming from.

What I forgot to mention is that in the accompanying letter, they state that these two sets of T&Cs fullfil their duty to provide a "True Copy" of the agreement.

It was that that incensed me a little because I wondered how many people would possibly have fallen for that and begun to pay on a Stat Barred, or almost Stat Barred debt

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...