Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Recommended Posts

Here is my quandry:

 

I have my deposit held by DPS.

 

I ended my tenancy and was asked to give up almost half my deposit (£790 - £382)

 

As the house had dated decor and old fixtures (noted in the inventory) I argued the fact that I had left the property in as best condition as possible. In fact, I spent a great deal of my time cleaning a house that was falling to bits. I made a counter offer via the DPS site, which was rejected.

 

In the meantime the house was sold without any of the work (noted in an email from my letting agent) pertaining to the withheld portion of the deposit being done.

 

I know this because:

- I moved two doors down so I have a very good idea about who comes and goes

- I can see the house from the outside to the front and rear and

- The photos of the house put on the selling agent's website did not include any new work, besides a very dodgy wallpapering over of a severely damp-affected wall.

 

Thinking that the sale of the house may change the situation, I waited 3 weeks for my landlord to return from holidays to hear what her new instructions would be.

 

Today, I received an email from the letting agency that reads as follows:

 

I have been in discussions with your landlord with regards to a deduction and they have advised they will accept a £250 deduction to now get the matter settled. If this cannot be agreed and the matter is referred to the DPS for adjudication they will be making a claim for the full amount and not that of £250.

 

So...the landlord has sold the property without getting any of the work done and made an arbitrary claim for £250 with the implied threat that I should take it or suffer the consequences. What to do?

 

Thoughts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi brenawilson

Welcome to The Consumer Action Group.

 

 

I am just letting you know that as you haven't had any replies to your post yet, it might be better if you post your message again in an appropriate sub-forum. You will get lots of help there.

 

Also take some time to read around the forum and get used to the layout. It is a big forum and takes a lot of getting used to.

 

 

Once you start to find your way, you will soon realise that it is fairly easy to get round and to get the help you need.

 

It can be bit confusing at first.

Please be advised that my time will be limited for the next few weeks.Thanks for your understanding.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome, brenawilson.

 

I've moved your thread to the appropriate Forum.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert - Slick132

Link to post
Share on other sites

The landlord can only deduct for the actual financial cost of damages.

 

In this case, there has been no DIRECT financial cost, as the damage remedial work was not performed.

 

Generally speaking, I would say there is no basis for deductions due to this.

 

However, their counter may be the reduction in the value of the property due to the damages. I have never seen such a claim, and as such I wouldnt like to say if it would be valid or invalid. However, I think they would have a hard job quantifying the reduction.

 

My personal advice would be to pursue the full amount, on the basis that there is no proof of cost incurred.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If deposit is in DPS scheme, was their free alternative dispute resolution sheme invoked by you or LL?

Who rejected your offer?

If claim goes to ADR, the undisputed amount should be returned to you asap. The disputed sum will be retained in the scheme, pending a decision.

The LL would have to provide evidence of damage claimed. Normally compare pre & post tenancy inspections/inventories hopefully with photos.

Wear & tear assessment would depend on condition at start and length of Tenancy.

I assume LL is claiming the full deposit?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...