Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

    • Hi Can you put post up in PDF redacted your full Tenancy Agreement we need to see it all not just those clause As for the Estate Agency stating your Rent and Deposit is paying for the Redecoration of the property is wrong as this was there and the Landlords responsibility to claim those cost back from the Previous Tenants from either their Rents or Tenancy Deposit therefore the Redecoration cost is the Landlords Problem not not yours nor your Rent or Tenancy Deposit (until end of Tenancy) I would be writing to the Estate Agency asking further to your telephone conversation with XXXXXXXXX  on XX/XX/2025 you require Clarification as it was stated by your employee that I would not receive any rent nor deposit back as compensation as the Landlord was using this to Redecorate the Property. Neither my Rent nor Deposit should be used to Redecorate this Property due to the Previous Tenants as this should have been claimed back from the previous Tenants via either there Rents or Tenancy Deposit. Further to this I collected the keys as agreed on the 5th July 2025 to move into this Property with no mention at all from your Estate Agency that due to all the Redecoration ongoing when I went to that Property on that date I was not able to move into the Property as Agreed in me Agreement. You have then move my moving in date to 11th July 2025 therefore my Rent payments should commence from 11th July 2025 and I require confirmation from PPM Estate Agency and if refuse this full clarification as to why and what Housing Legislation and clauses from my Agreement. DO NOT PHONE and ask this unless you can record the call Send it by email but also follow it up in writing and get free proof of posting from the Post Office
    • Heat pump makers are ready to raise output, but demand is still sluggish.View the full article
    • The deal is part of the Trump administration's push for more aggressive adoption of artificial intelligence in the government.View the full article
    • Apologies for my laziness.  I did say I would read through the WS and suggest changes about two months ago ... but got lost in the fun of going on holiday twice. I promise that sleeves will be rolled up in the morning!
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

E-sure cancelled my car insurance policy after a recent accident. I bumped into the back on the vehicle in front about 50m after setting off from traffic lights.

My vehicle was deemed a write off / total loss despite being valued considerably more than the repair cost and I was not given the chance to contest the decision. I later found out that it was a category D write off and told by the customer assistant that they'd likely sell my vehicle on. I asked for a copy of the damage report on my vehicle from E-sure and after the telephone assistant spoke to the supervisor I was denied this, despite E-sure having chosen the repairer who gave the estimate and the vehicle being legally mine.

I was told that the policy was being cancelled because the vehicle was "no longer in an insurable condition". I was also told that I WOULD NOT receive a refund on paid premiums. I'd paid for 12 months and had 3 when the accident occurred. The extra hire car cover I had taken on my policy was a joke.

Now that I have to acknowledge that I've had a cancelled policy my premiums have doubled. If I had been given the option to have the car repaired ( I had a discussion with the valuation engineer technician about this but was not given any say) I would have got my remaining 9 months worth of insurance that I'd paid for and my premiums would have increased but certainly not doubled.

To say that I feel aggrieved is an understatement. I've been subjected to having my vehicle declared a total loss against my wishes and also a refund that I think I should be entitled to denied. My premiums and history are now shot to bits. What is the point of insurance? My vehicle had no modifications in any shape or form. Bog standard first time accident at a slow speed.

 

Dangerously, the policy booklet is highly inadequate. Throughout my discussions on telephone I was consistently referred to the "total loss" (Section 5 element of the booklet). It spells out how the process works but nowhere mentions the fact that as a fully comprehensive driver you are no longer covered 3rd party to drive another vehicle. That little nugget is hidden in tiny small print on the bottom of the actual certificate of insurance. Surely this should be included in the Total Loss segment of the policy booklet?

 

I have just written to E-sure and will also be writing to the Ombudsman. The FSA regulations regarding insurance policy cancellations appear to have been broken by E-sure and I am keen to seek my refund and compensation.

 

Grateful for any advice.

 

Thanks,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Definitely complain about the claims process, as that sounds like a total mess. They should have told you about the damage that made it a write off and then explained the process for agreeing to a market value. You can appeal if the market value is not to your satisfaction. Esure should have explained the process for complaining about the market value.

 

In regard to cancellation and any refund. Actually this is fairly normal amongst Insurers. Insurers have met their policy obligations. You took out an annual policy for car x and they paid out for a total loss. There was then no car to Insure. The Insurers would then cancel the policy and there would be no refund. If you make a claim, the whole years Insurance is payable.

 

If the cancellation is due to the write off claim and not any issue of you not declaring something or any accusation of wrongdoing, then this is not something you declare. When Insurers ask about having a policy cancelled, they are really meaning cancellation due to non disclosure or something which is about wrongful conduct. Your cancellation in this case, was just as a result of a total loss claim. That is all you need to advise Insurers, when you phone them.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

Thank you for your reply. It has been helpful.

 

What then happens to my no claims? I asked E-sure for written clarification as, on the telephone, they advised that I would probably lose 2 years of my no claims bonus. The letter I received stated that "I was entitled to 5 years no claims bonus at the time of cancelling my policy". What do I tell a new insurer then?

 

The other thing that mystifies me is that FSA regulations state,

".....your insurer has the right to cancel a policy by giving seven days written notice. If this is the case they must refund any premium paid, minus the cost of insuring you while the policy was in force. For example, if you had paid the full annual premium of £500, but they decided to cancel your policy after just six months, you may entitled to £250 refund....."

 

Have E-sure not flown in the face of this? I don't understand how they are entitled to keep a full years premiums for a service that has only been made available for 3 months. If you held a yearly bus ticket and the bus service was withdrawn after 3 months, you'd expect a refund surely. Yes, I had an accident but that's why you have insurance.

 

Am I being unreasonable?

Link to post
Share on other sites

In theory you lose 2 years NCB, but if they have said you have 5 years at the point of cancellation, you have to take their word for it. Perhaps you had 7 years and they reduced it down to 5 years.

 

In regard to the FSA wording above. It does state somewhere else, that if you have had a claim, that you are not entitled to any refund on the annual premium paid and that you have to pay for the full years Insurance. This has always been the case. You had an annual Insurance policy and not a 3 month policy. They cancelled it, as the Insurance contract had been fully complied with. You had a total loss and you cannot have any more compliance than that. If you think about it. It would not be very fair if you Insured a car for say £5k at a premium of say £500 and paid out the £5k, but the policyholder only wanted to pay for 3 months. They may allow people to pay monthly, but it is an annual contract. The bit you are not happy about, is that Esure cancel the policy and don't let you Insure another car for the remaining 9 months. Some Insurers do this and some don't.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The terminology they have used is poor. They have not cancelled thepolicy, it has been fulfilled.

 

 

When you take out insurance on an item you are effectively buying the right for a 3rd party to indemnify you against the risk of loss. If you lose the item and claim on the contract and the 3rd party obliges then the contract has been complete. Because it is complete it will no longer cover you. This occurs when a car is deemed as a write off. However for a contract to be complete in full it must also be paid for in full. Otherwise it would be like you no longer paying for some things you bought on finance because the goods have been delivered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...