Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Recommended Posts

i am eligible to apply for student loan but have decided against this and prefer to carry on receiving income support whilst at university.

 

Social insist that as student loan is available i have to apply for this and hav stopped my income support.

 

Are they correct as i do not want a loan that i have to repay?

 

Any feed back would be appreciated

 

emm1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Emm1

 

I can see why you think income support would be a better option over a student loan but it's not necessarily the case. When you step into employment, let's say full time, you will only repay this back through your taxes anyway!

 

My personal opinion as I am not aware of all the facts is to research about student loans so you are aware of the repayment scheme once you graduate. You have to earn over a certain yearly salary before having to pay back, and even then it is only a small %, so it is fair. It doesn't work like other loans that banks give out for example.

 

Does this help in anyway?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats correct, I.S is a means tested benefit, its for people who have no income or no entitlement to other benefits

 

A student loan is classed as an Income, and if you are entitled to it you must take it.

 

There are disregards on some parts of the Grant so, you still may be entitled to I.S after your claim is reassesed

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi, You dont have to take your student loan, however it is classed as income, as Nystagmite said, whether you take it or not, because it is available they take it into account for things like benefits and housing/council tax benefit. Depending on the reason for you being on I.S you may be entitled to other financial support, Check with a benefits or finance officer at your Uni. If for example your I.S claim was because you are sick or disabled there as a lot of things you can apply for within uni. Just remember, it might be worth asking anyone who gives or refuses you anything I.E HB/CT benefit and other benefits for an explanation of how they came to their decision, Councils are terrible when dealing with students and often make mistakes when working stuff out

 

good luck

claire

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there still a disabled student allowance?

 

When I was at Uni I used to get DLA, Invalidity Benefit and a Disabled student allowance which payed for a PC (When they were pretty expensive), books, recording equipment, helper, etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I had to get receipts for books, etc. and i was reimbursed. In theory books and PC are available for all to use on campus, in reality all students would need to buy Books and PCs, so there may not be extra money, but not having to buy the books and PCs frees up money that would have otherwise been spent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...