Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Recommended Posts

I think this latest company being in the same state as you is just a coincidence. The validation of the debt letter is a phishing trip to see if you bite. Once you reply, they will be on your case, pushing you for as much as you can pay, so you are left with a dime after getting paid.

 

Thing is my original creditor knows my address, which is where the DCA got it from. So I feel they would be fairly confident they know where I am so not sure why they would need to 'phish' in that sense?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thing is my original creditor knows my address, which is where the DCA got it from. So I feel they would be fairly confident they know where I am so not sure why they would need to 'phish' in that sense?

 

By phishing I meant that they were looking for you to contact them, worried that they had your address and that they would come knocking on your door. This has obviously worked.

 

Up to you want you do next. But once you start paying them, there will be a long road ahead in making payments. Even when you make payments, expect them to hassle you every few months for an increase. They may add on collection fees and any interest that the original loan agreement allows.

 

Personally, I think I would wait to see how they are going to enforce any repayments. If this includes UK court action and then US court action, it won't be a quick process, if they bother. I have not read of any such action being taken, which is odd given the number of these loans that have been defaulted on, with the debtor living abroad.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys, just to clarify something, aren't student loans, kind of, not necessarily repayable. I mean I have taken a student loan and if I don't make more than 20k a year I don't have to a penny and I don't pay the debt in 15 years the whole debt is discarded. Any opinions on that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

For a post 98 student loan (but not the new policy issued by this coalition government) I believe the government have 20 years to collect the debt. Under that loan scheme, I thought you had to repay a percentage on earnings over £15k. But there were various special arrangements, where if you went into certain occupations the debt would be discounted. Someone told me that when they went into teaching that the government would reduce the debt, after a period of so many years as a teacher.

 

Under the new student loan finance the coalition issued, the legislation allows 30 years for the debt to be collected and you start repayments once you earn £20k. So in 30 years, if you never earned this sum, then yes it would be written off.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you don’t have to pay

If you earn less than £15,000 a year you don't have to continue repaying your loan until your income increases (if it's a post 1998 loan) but there are also circumstances when your loan might be written off altogether.

 

If you die. If you die while you owe money on your student loan it will be written off.

 

If you are permanently unfit for work. If you receive disability benefits and, because of your disability, are declared permanently unfit for work your loan will be written off.

 

If you took out your loan on or after 2006. In this case your loan will be written off on the 25th anniversary of the date that you became liable to repay it.

 

If you took out your loan before 2006. Here your student loan would be written off once you reach the age of 65.

 

If you took out your loan before 1998. In this case the rules are rather complicated. If you were aged under 40 when you took out your last agreement for a student loan it will be cancelled when you reach 50. If you were aged 40 when your last agreement was made, it’s cancelled when you reach the age of 60 and in any event it will be cancelled after 25 years. Not exactly straightforward.

 

In Scotland it’s written off 35 years after you were first liable to repay it if you took it out for the first time after August 2007 and at age 65 if you took the student loan out before 1st August 2007.

 

Also on the pre 1998 Student loan if you have made no payment, deferment or written acknowledgement of the debt it becomes Statute Barred after six years and cannot be enforced.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
Bumping a very old thread here, but wondering if the OP's situation was resolved? What ended up happening with the US DCA?

 

Thanks!

 

It is very unlikely you would gain any response, as a new comment being added does not trigger an email being sent to the OP.

 

If you click on the triangle in your post or send an email to CAG admin to ask whether they could send the OP an email to the OP, they may do so. It would just ask the OP to update their thread on CAG, if they get a chance.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bumping a very old thread here, but wondering if the OP's situation was resolved? What ended up happening with the US DCA?

 

Thanks!

 

 

they cant do anything to you.

 

 

might be better to start a new thread

 

 

of your own.

 

 

the op get san email anyway.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...