Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Recommended Posts

Not sure if I'm doing this right I'm new to this,

 

I had a suspended possession order two years ago the arrears was approx 1700

 

I was ordered to pay rent 514 and 10 pounds a week, in bits and pieces

 

I have fallen behind 390 pounds in rent,

housing association are now taking it back to court for eviction,

 

I can pay the 390 to bring payments up to date but as its a multiple breach she will not cancel the court action,

 

I am now working full time and have a dependent child who has just got into college and found a work placement,

 

I have no family in my area, losing my home would mean me locating 300 miles away!

 

I was struggling to make payments as my son was attacked by a dog and needed hospitalising this led to me reducing my hours at work

I then couldn't increase my hours so had to find another job which I did and am now working full time

 

please can someone help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there I have moved your thread to the Repossession forum where more people will see it - I will try and come back later today to see if I can help.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say there is an SPO already - then say the HA are taking it back to court. They don't need to take it back to court. Have they said they are specifically going to issue proceedings against you, or merely execute the warrant on the SPO they already hold?

 

If the latter, then once you get the notice of eviction, you will need to make a stay application. It is highly unlikely that a judge will not stay any eviction if you can show good reason for falling behind (proof) and evidence that you can make the payments in the future (proof required). If you can bring the agreement back up to date then do so. I am confused however as you state you are £390 in arrears of rent, but surely that is the sum total of your missed payments? If you can pay it now, why didn't you pay it before? (Question a judge will ask.)

 

Also, £390 is equivalent to 39 weeks of missed payments - so I am not surprised the HA are seeking to evict - it's a wanton disregard of a) your obligation to pay rent and b) a court order - the judge won't be happy that you simply ignored what was ordered UNLESS you have a very good reason for it (I doubt your son was in hospital for 39 weeks). But as I said, there are few judges who will award outright possession of social housing on arrears of £1100, particularly if, since the SPO was granted, the arrears have actually come down - even if not by the amount expected.

 

Is the £1100 after you pay the £390 or before?

 

Please do not think I am being harsh with you - the judge will be much harsher and far better for you to read it here and prepare yourself for the type of questioning you may get in court, than think it will all be a breeze. Social housing is in high demand - many judges will tear strips off those who have it but who don't pay their rent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was a spo and I have always made the 10 pounds a week payment, but when my son was in hospital I missed a months rent and have been trying to make up the missed payment but then only was working part time so some months couldn't pay the full rent, so over a year all the shortfalls add up to 390, I received a letter this morning and the arrears in total is 976, so if I pay 390 it will leave 586 outstanding, they are executing the warrant the already hold, thank u

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, that's not so bad then as you had a very specific reason for missing the payment that you did and will almost certainly be able to provide documented proof of this from the hospital/GP. This is better than missing 39 payments of a court order. Make the £390 payment as soon as you can and keep the receipt to show to the judge if you have to make a stay application (on form N244). I can virtually guarantee that you will not lose your home on the basis of owing less than £600.

 

I know it's difficult but try not to worry too much - it was just a blip caused by a specific incident and judges are always going to be sympathetic to the realities of life.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I'm out of my mind!! I'm going to pay the 390 to bring the payments up to date, I have proof from doctors surgery, and can prove I'm now in full time employment, is a letter from employer sufficient? I will prepare a financial statement, no eviction date yet? Can u help me with the wording on the n244 statement and how to prepare it? I would be really grateful

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I can help you with the N244. Please have a read of my guide here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?325527-CAG-guide-Are-you-facing-eviction-or-repossession where you will see examples of how to complete the N244 and also download the budget sheet we normally use in these cases (it calculates automatically as you fill it in). I am at work at the moment but will try and get back to you this evening. It's best to wait till you have an eviction warrant delivered as the cost of entering the application is £80 but only £40 if you have a warrant for eviction.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi can anyone advise me I have paid the 390, and have letter from GP, letter from employer stating I'm employed full time can anyone help me put it all together and how to submit and fill in n244 eviction date is 1st July thank u for your advice so far

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...