Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

    • Is this another distraction? Tulsi Gabbard calls for Obama to be prosecuted over 2016 election claims | Barack Obama | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Trump intelligence chief accuses ex-president and others of ‘treasonous conspiracy’ for alleging Russian interference  
    • A Labour MP says GB Energy should buy British to avoid the risk of forced labour in supply chains.View the full article
    • The world's race to decarbonise has led to the rise of electric cars - and with it, soaring demand for lithium, which is required for the batteriesView the full article
    • New thread started as you & LFI suggested.  It's best to have one ticket per thread, if not people get confused about which ticket they're giving advice for. Firstly, you have every right to be absolutely fuming at MFG.  You go twice and spend money - and what do you get?  A demand for £100!  Do the people who caused this mess resolve it?  No, they lie and mess you about.  No wonder you're so angry. However ... we're worried you’re leaving yourself open to accusations of theft (even though you made it clear the goods would be returned) and criminal damage.  If you take the initiative and approach the garage politely, (a) that covers yourself at least a bit regarding any possible criminal accusations, and (b) if the manager has a brain you two can easily sort everything out. I say if the manager has a brain.  They might try and play the hard case and stupidly put the blame on you.  Who knows. Anyway, how about sending this 1st class post on Monday?   Dear Manager, I am the person who temporarily took some non-perishable goods from the BP shop on Wednesday and left a letter. I have since calmed down and am writing this letter in a friendly, amicable way between adults without abuse or at all costs apportioning blame. What happened is that some time back I visited your premises at 3.15am to buy fuel.  I then revisited at 8.30pm the same day to use the shop. Afterwards I received an invoice from Euro Car Parks for £100 (discounted to £60 if paid within 14 days). What happened is that the ANPR cameras joined the two visits together and ECP issued the invoice for me staying an absurd 17 hours.  I mean you provide a good service but who would stay 17 hours! If you Google "double dipping" you will see that this is a continual problem in the private parking industry and the industry’s own Code of Practice highlights how steps should be taken to avoid issuing invoices in these cases. When I brought this to MFG's customer services' attention you refused to have the invoice cancelled.  I also visited you and again you were unhelpful. Please "take a step backwards" and put yourself in my position.  Say you visited a supermarket on a Saturday evening.  You also visited on a Sunday evening. Later you got a demand for £100 from a private parking company.  You politely asked the supermarket to intervene but they refused.  I think you would consider the matter unfair and you would be extremely angry with the appalling customer service. Anyone who has even a rough knowledge of the law knows that ECP are your agents, you called them in.  You are the organ grinder.  They are the monkey.  You can easily tell them to cancel this invoice. So i am writing to request an appointment with you in order firstly to return the goods which are yours and of course which I should never have taken.  I would like us to be able to speak in a friendly, adult manner. However, secondly I am not prepared to take all the blame for this matter.  I also request confirmation from you that you have had this unfair invoice cancelled. Yours,
    • A new generation of wealth creators has fuelled demand for private members-only clubs in Asia's third largest economy.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Not sure if this is the right place to post this, if not please can a mod move it to the correct area.

 

I've received two letters from Bryan Carter Sols for two accounts that Lowell are chasing.

the first one has the correct account number and the second one has two digits missing from the end. Both accounts had been placed in dispute (2009).

Bryan Carters' letters states that he will recommend proceeding to be issued after 14 days.

 

I wrote back, telling him one account was placed in dispute in 2009, and I do not recognise the other account number apart from being similar to an account that was also placed in dispute in 2009.

My letter also stated, if their client feels they have the right and valid reasons to go to litigation then they should contact me

with any supporting documentation and their legal rights to the accounts. I also made it clear that I would defend any claim.

 

Response letter fro BC Sols: Account on hold, and awaiting clients instructions.

 

 

Received two letters the day after from Fredrickson International Ltd (one for each account) Saying that neither their client nor the OC have any records of a dispute on the account, and I should forward and correspondence evidencing a dispute or contact them with payment proposals.

 

I've copies of the letters sent in 2009 of the s.77/78 request and of the in dispute letters both with proof of postage.

the question is should I send them or just wait for there next move?

 

thank you,

Edited by appo07
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi appo07,

 

Carter and Freds are linked and Carter does tend to issue claims unless he is headed off. You can defend if there is a claim and usually he'll back down then, but I think it's better not to have that hassle in the first place. :-)

 

Who were the accounts with and when were they opened?

 

DD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

One is an Adams store card and the other a Barclay card.

I have correspondence from both OCs regarding my s77/78 requests and dispute letters, so it's clear that Fredrickson asn't contacted either of them.

 

Both accounts are pre 2006, and have been passed around several DCA before Lowell. I't looks like they have bought the accounts without any info.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When was the last payment made to either account.

 

 

You have made them aware there is a dispute, it is for them to discuss this with the companies they have purchased from.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply,

 

Last payments was in 2009.

Should I just leave it and see what they do next or send them a letter telling them that I don't need to prove anything?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't need to tell them that you don't need to prove it unless you want to dance to their tune.

FI churn out the Carter letter themselves and do not litigate on cases passed from FI's ultimate owners Lowell which have already done the DCA circuit without result.

The BC wrong account no. happened to loads of accounts they sold to Lowell. I'd be interested to see how they respond to a CCA request with a 13 digit credit card account no..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi,

 

My husband is having the same issue with Fredrickson - they, too, have quoted a thirteen digit account number as did Lowell before them. Scotcall (the DCA before that) didn't even bother quoting anything like a recognisable account number.

 

Both Hamptons Financial and Red also quoted only thirteen digit account numbers. The only DCA who appeared to have got it right was NCO way back in June 2010. That's the last record we have of correct details.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barclaycard, presumably? If so, ignore. When Lowell are serious - that's if they see you have assets - they don't mess around with Fredrickson (whom they own) but go straight for the jugular, often a statutory demand via BW Legal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...