Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

    • Beijing says the economy grew by 5.2% in the three months to the end of June, compared to the same time last year.View the full article
    • Hi Can you put post up in PDF redacted your full Tenancy Agreement we need to see it all not just those clause As for the Estate Agency stating your Rent and Deposit is paying for the Redecoration of the property is wrong as this was there and the Landlords responsibility to claim those cost back from the Previous Tenants from either their Rents or Tenancy Deposit therefore the Redecoration cost is the Landlords Problem not not yours nor your Rent or Tenancy Deposit (until end of Tenancy) I would be writing to the Estate Agency asking further to your telephone conversation with XXXXXXXXX  on XX/XX/2025 you require Clarification as it was stated by your employee that I would not receive any rent nor deposit back as compensation as the Landlord was using this to Redecorate the Property. Neither my Rent nor Deposit should be used to Redecorate this Property due to the Previous Tenants as this should have been claimed back from the previous Tenants via either there Rents or Tenancy Deposit. Further to this I collected the keys as agreed on the 5th July 2025 to move into this Property with no mention at all from your Estate Agency that due to all the Redecoration ongoing when I went to that Property on that date I was not able to move into the Property as Agreed in me Agreement. You have then move my moving in date to 11th July 2025 therefore my Rent payments should commence from 11th July 2025 and I require confirmation from PPM Estate Agency and if refuse this full clarification as to why and what Housing Legislation and clauses from my Agreement. DO NOT PHONE and ask this unless you can record the call Send it by email but also follow it up in writing and get free proof of posting from the Post Office
    • Heat pump makers are ready to raise output, but demand is still sluggish.View the full article
    • The deal is part of the Trump administration's push for more aggressive adoption of artificial intelligence in the government.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone!

 

I hope someone can help.

 

I approached a company in Essex to purchase a car -

they are similar to ACF in that they help people with not so perfect credit, and the car and the finance comes from them.

 

According to them I was approved, and I chose a car online (I have never been on their premises).

 

I spoke to the sales person, who said that they require a £200 holding deposit to remove the car from sale and to show that you are serious about purchasing the vehicle.

I agreed with him over the phone a monthly repayment, but was not given details of the car price or anything else.

I paid the deposit and then he sent a receipt, which stated the following:-

 

"By paying an initial deposit you are committing to the purchase of the above vehicle.

xxxx will immediately commence preparation work on your vehicle for delivery and remove it from sale.

 

The first £200 of your holding deposit is non-transferable and non-refundable unless your application for finance is declined

or the vehicle is not as described.

 

xxxxx also reserve the right to retain the first £200 of your holding deposit if the finance application is declined due to material inaccuracies

in personal information you have provided.

 

Should you not pay for the goods, either by way of a cash payment or a finance facility, by the agreed pick up date,

or you miss two agreed collection dates, then we will assume that you do not want the vehicle and that you have repudiated your contract with us.

 

In this case, we will be entitled to keep the holding deposit you have paid

"

 

However none of this was explained to me at the time of paying the deposit.

 

I then received the pre-contract information, but my application for finance hadn't been approved yet.

 

They were still asking for additional documents.

 

This was the first time I had seen details of the price of the car which was £10k, at least £2k over the going rate for this type of vehicle,

in addition to this, the monthly payment was much higher than what I had agreed with the salesperson,

and the total repayment to the company was stated as £23k!!

 

When I saw this I immediately emailed them and said I no longer wished to go ahead with the application, and could they return my deposit.

 

I am sensible enough to know that having had credit problems in the past, the last thing I wished to do was pay over 200%

what I borrowed on a car that would be worth about half its value currently at the end of the agreement!

 

They ignored my first email, and instead sent another pre-contract information form reducing the monthly repayments

to just £20 more than had been previously agreed.

 

I then emailed again refering them to my last email and saying that I didnt' wsh to go ahead and to cancel my application.

 

I then got a phone call 2 days after from another salesman saying that the one I had been dealing with didn't work there anymore

and that he apologised for the 'mistake' on the pre-contract information.

 

I then told him I wasn't going ahead because the agreement was too expensive,

and I hadn't been made aware of hte APR or anything before hand. He, clearly annoyed asked whether I wanted him to cancel the agreement

 

- I said we didn't have an agreement, I hadn't signed anything,

as far as I was aware we were still going through the application process,

in fact they were still waiting for documents from me.

 

He then said that I wouldn't get back my deposit, and I told him that the terms of the deposit were not explained to me before paying the money,

and that had I known the terms I wouldn't have paid it.

 

He said that they had spent money preparing the car for me so that was why I couldn't get the money back.

 

I asked whether that meant that if someone else wanted to buy the car tomorrow that they wouldn't charge them £200 as the car was already prepared?

 

He put the phone down.

Do I have any rights to my deposit, is there any argument I can give?

 

Can I claim the money back under the visa chargeback scheme?

 

Please help!

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is an unfair contract and thus invalid.

You can claim your money back via chargeback, explain to your bank why and indemnify them against any monies that are disputed and they will do it. This has been part of the banking regulations for a good while now but many bank staff dont know that you can do this.

As your payment was done at a distance, even thougth the full purchase wouldnt have been, it is clear that you were not given a level playing field due to the information you need to make the consideration was not there so the company cant really complain that you want your money back. No court would side with the car dealers in this case so go to your bank, arrange the chargeback and write to the company making clear the points you raise here and tell them that no contract had been formed, just an interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is an unfair contract and thus invalid.

You can claim your money back via chargeback, explain to your bank why and indemnify them against any monies that are disputed and they will do it. This has been part of the banking regulations for a good while now but many bank staff dont know that you can do this.

As your payment was done at a distance,

even thougth the full purchase wouldnt have been, it is clear that you were not given a level playing field due to the information you need to make the consideration was not there so the company cant really complain that you want your money back. No court would side with the car dealers in this case so go to your bank, arrange the chargeback and write to the company making clear the points you raise here and tell them that no contract had been formed, just an interest.

 

Thanks so much, I will get into the bank now

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...