Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

    • Apologies for my laziness.  I did say I would read through the WS and suggest changes about two months ago ... but got lost in the fun of going on holiday twice. I promise that sleeves will be rolled up in the morning!
    • Yes, it is a cracking snotty letter. @Nicky Boy Position in your "Snotty Letter of the Year" ranking please 🤣 Write at the bottom COPIED TO PREMIER PARK LTD and when you want invest in two 2nd class stamps (all your adversaries are worth) and get two free Certificates of Posting from the post office.
    • I haven't heard back from Tom & Co. since my email on Friday. Surprising! In the meantime I am preparing to file my statement for good, so please find below a new version and the amendment details. I also have a few procedural questions: Do I need to attach any or all evidence at this stage?  My possible evidence consists of: All my correspondence with CMS, which they have already submitted as part of their own evidence. So I don't think I need to submit the same. I have a correspondence history of me trying to claim expenses from Saudia which was like pulling teeth. Do I need to submit this to prove that I gave the defendant many chances to make things right. I think this was more relevant for the actual trial and not that much for the set aside. Opinions more than welcome. Boarding passes to prove I was travelling to Korea when they were trying to harass me. Is this necessary?  Their request for a remote hearing and my response. Probably not that relevant but may as well include it if they want full correspondence. Can I claim for a return train ticket to the court and back for this hearing when I win? Can I calim for additional interest for the time Saudia have stalled my payment with their set aside rigmarole?   Updated WS:     Detail of changes: Added paragraph 1. Introduction 1.      My name is K and I am a particular with no prior legal training or experience. This is my first appearance at a court. Added paragraph 18. filing a defense late. I am not 100% sure that this is legally correct so please do comment 18.      Furthermore if the solicitor had missed the deadline by inadvertence, the correct steps to follow would have been to file their defence anyway, and the judge may have decided to proceed with the trial providing the defence was valid. Considering the defendant is a professional solicitor, requesting for an extension was a surprising – and ineffective – choice, and again I suspect that this has nothing to do with them trying to follow due process, but so that they could invoke court fees with the sole purpose of threatening me to pay for them.   Added mentions to the strike out and summary judgement in paragraphs 31 and introduction Added my address in the introduction Some typos and grammar fixes, still plenty I'm sure! Some shortenings. Yes I know it's still a bit long. If @FTMDave wants to make some further cuts, now is the chance!              
    • The coffees shop firm is offering one-time payments to staff who decide to leave rather than comply.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Recommended Posts

Wonder if anyone can help with my situation please I am a bit unsure what to do.

 

Just over a year ago I (stupidly) took out a logbook loan on my vehicle for £1360. The repayment agreement was £40.11 per week for 156 weeks. The idea was to use it as a short term loan and settle the balance off a couple of months later avoiding the ridiculous interest rate for keeping the loan for the full term. (£6257.16 repayable).

 

Unfortunately circumstances changed I lost my job and was unable to do so. I kept up the payments for 11 months until July 2014 and have repaid in total £1407.69 to date.

 

The payment arrangement on the contract states weekly however I was told I could also pay monthly- which I had been doing since the start of the agreement. Due to loss of employment in November 2013 and again in July 2014- I fell slightly behind on payments. 6 weeks behind- which is not even 2 late payments when paying monthly. The logbook loan company at both these times instructed high court enforcement officers to attend my address to recover the vehicle.

 

I explained to them on both occasions that I was not even 2 payments late and only £240.66 in arrears and they left after 30 seconds with no further action. After the first time I gained employment again quite quickly so was able to bring the arrears up to date. In July- I contacted the logbook loan company to try and set up a reduced payment plan that I could afford whilst unemployed. They were extremely unhelpful and refused point blank to accept anything less than £30 per week- which I started to pay weekly.

 

I requested a full statement of my account to see exactly how much I had left to pay and the settlement figure should I somehow be able to settle it off once I gained employment. Upon receiving this- I noticed that they had added on extortionate charges for instructing the high court enforcement officers on 2 occasions. All they did was knock on my door speak to me for 30 seconds and then leave. No recovery action or any other action was taken. Yet the logbook loan company added a total of £900 in "recovery charges" onto my account despite nothing being recovered.

 

Obviously I was unhappy about this and after much discussions getting me nowhere told them I would stop repayments until they removed the charges from my account. They refused- instructed a solicitor- and I now received from them a county court claim through the post with a "return of goods hearing" to take place in 4 weeks time. The claim details the full £6257.16 repayable for the full term of the agreement minus the £1407.69 I have paid plus additional costs and interest of £900 bringing the total to £5793.96.

 

I have no idea what a return of good hearing entails- or what my best course of action is. Can anyone help?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi j1 and welcome to CAG

 

There will be a court form (N9C) with the claim that you should fill in and send back to the court within 14 days. You must fill this in if you want the court to suspend the return of goods order and allow you to keep the goods. You need to offer to pay the debt back in monthly instalments you can afford.

 

Where you need to keep the goods, it is important to treat this debt as a priority over ordinary credit debts and offer as much as you can afford.

 

Send the form back to the court, not the creditor. The court will send a copy of your form to the creditor.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to  The National Consumer Service  to help us to keep on helping you 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply.

 

There was no form sent with the claim. Just a date for a return of goods hearing. Meaning that a return of goods order has not been made yet.

 

Shall I print off the N9C form and send it in prior to the hearing? Or do I just have to attend? If so do you have any advice on attending the hearing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

" I now received from them a county court claim through the post with a "return of goods hearing" "

 

I thought you had received a claim?

 

A creditor may try to get a 'Return Order' from the court, which forces you to return your goods. However, there must be a court hearing first (probably in your local County Court).

Before the hearing, the court sends you a 'Claim Form', which gives you the chance to return the goods yourself. They'll also send you an 'admission form', which lets you:

 

explain your financial situation

 

make a new offer of monthly payments to the creditor

 

You must send the admission form back to the court within 14 days. The court then talks to the creditor to see if they'll accept your terms. If they do, the hearing is cancelled; if not, or if you don't send back the form, the hearing goes ahead.

The court then decides whether or not to enforce the Return Order or 'suspend' it (meaning it will be enforced if you miss another payment later on). If you're allowed to keep your goods, the court will set your new monthly payments.

If you don't attend the hearing, the judge usually grants the Return Order.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to  The National Consumer Service  to help us to keep on helping you 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

See my last post..updated.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to  The National Consumer Service  to help us to keep on helping you 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Speak to the court that sent the hearing Notice and explain what you have and not received....they will advise.

 

Then come back for further guidance.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to  The National Consumer Service  to help us to keep on helping you 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...