Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Court paperwork


Eddie

Recommended Posts

Hi - just a quick one i hope.

 

When should you send in the bundle of paperwork to the court is it with the Allocation Questionnaire?

 

Thank you everyone in advance for your help

Data Protection Act letter sent 30/05/06

Statements rec'd - 07/06/06

Preliminary approach letter sent - 09/06/06

Reply rec'd - 15/06/06

LBA sent 26/06/06

Reply rec'd 30/06/06

Moneyclaimonline submitted 10/07/06

Claim issued 11/07/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

we have a court date of 13th December but it doesn't say anything about supplying any paperwork - whys that???

 

It seems a bit strange.

 

I may just send the paperwork off anyway - who do i send it to - is it just the courts?

 

 

Thanks for the quick reply Bookworm

Data Protection Act letter sent 30/05/06

Statements rec'd - 07/06/06

Preliminary approach letter sent - 09/06/06

Reply rec'd - 15/06/06

LBA sent 26/06/06

Reply rec'd 30/06/06

Moneyclaimonline submitted 10/07/06

Claim issued 11/07/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need three copies, one for self, one to send to the court and one for bcards solicitors. Would phone the court and ask when they want the court bundle by

 

skb

Victory over Lloyds £890

Click!

Victory over Vodafone: default removal

click!

Victory over Lloyds PPI claim £2606 click!

Barclaycard lazygoing - £580 + £398 contractual int at 17.7 % click! (Received partial payment £110 21/11/06)

The GF's battle against RBS click! stayed awaiting the end of the world

Link to post
Share on other sites

My claim is against Woolwich - but i'm guessing the same still applies????:confused:

Data Protection Act letter sent 30/05/06

Statements rec'd - 07/06/06

Preliminary approach letter sent - 09/06/06

Reply rec'd - 15/06/06

LBA sent 26/06/06

Reply rec'd 30/06/06

Moneyclaimonline submitted 10/07/06

Claim issued 11/07/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone got the correct bundle needed to take the Woolwich to court or any information as to what should be in the bundle as the basic court bundle doesn't appear to make much sense to me...

 

Thank you in advance

Data Protection Act letter sent 30/05/06

Statements rec'd - 07/06/06

Preliminary approach letter sent - 09/06/06

Reply rec'd - 15/06/06

LBA sent 26/06/06

Reply rec'd 30/06/06

Moneyclaimonline submitted 10/07/06

Claim issued 11/07/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

The Court Bundle should have a "Index" ie the contents page. This page will list the relevant documents. The purpose of the bundle is so that the Judge has all the documents he needs to make a decision - so include everything you think is relevant. If there are many documents use page dividers.

 

Thereafter you should have each relevant document in the bundle. Each page should have a number handwritten at the bottom. Enter these number on the Index for example:

 

INDEX TO BUNDLE

 

1) Consumer Credit Agreement dated 11/06/06 Pages 1-5

2) Letter to Claimant dated 20/08/08 6-6

 

Make one copy of the bundle including the index and the copy it twice. Three copies are required, one for you, the judge and the opponents. Send two copies to the Court and retain your one. Makesure the bundles are delivered to Court several days before the hearing. You can get away with arriving with the bundles on the day of the hearing but I would not risk it.

 

You never know the Claimant might never turn up on the day of the hearing especially if they think they will lose!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...