Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

    • Their letter to you was rather condescending and even rude  "-in order to allow a reasonable driver to be notified of the terms and conditions". So f they do decide to go ahead from here remember that when responding to their Witness Statement as they never get that right. 
    • Trump also threatened blanket tariffs of 15% or 20% on most trade partners, and said he will soon announce new tariffs on the EU.View the full article
    • We still have not seen either the Notice to Driver or hte Notice to Keeper PCNs. As these are legal documents that can help  your case could you please post them up. I did ask last year if you didn't retain the NTD that you send UKCPS an sar. Did you do that? If you don't have those two vital PCNs [not the reminders] can you please send off an asr now. Sometimes the rogues use Trace to confirm their address is till valid with a view to sending out a letter of Claim. If you have received the SAR could you please post up its contents.
    • One more thing Madge just make sure that you include the payment confirmation from the phone app to ECP. this will never see Court if anyone at ECP has the ability to read and understand English. Then send it off to court and ECP. Next -at least one bottle of wine between the two of you and relax. It is over..........................
    • Thank you Restart for posting the original PCN-it is the one that has to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. And thanks to Nicky - I hadn't noticed the word Reminder on the first PCN and wondered why it was posted on the 29th June but Restart said he had received it on the 24th. The original PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act Schedule 4 whicch means that you as keeper are therefore not liable for the charge. The driver is the only one now liable and as you haven't appealed they don't know who was driving so you are both in the clear.  It is non compliant because they have not included the actual parking period just their own ANPR times that obviously include driving from the entrance to the parking place and later driving to the exit. Section 9 [2][a] refers- (2)The notice must—(a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; They have also failed to ask the keeper to pay Section9 [2][e]  (e)state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper—(i)to pay the unpaid parking charges Sadly although both of you are in the clear there is nothing yoycan do to bring this to a quick close. So you will just have to read piles of letters containg threats and unlawful increases in the amount they are charging. They can all be safely ignored knowing that your case will be thrown out should it ever get to Court. Though Dave is right that a letter to Starbucks might get you a quick cancellation. All you have to watch out for is a Letter of Claim which if received let us know and we can advise a snotty letter to send back to them. The snottier it is the more likely they will decide not to go to CourtIn the meantime read up other cases which have been successfful or ongoing cases esprcially ones similar to yours to understand the way these vile companies operate. Do not contact them as  you might let slip who was driving and that at the moment is your strongest asset.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Recommended Posts

Hi all.

I originally had a debt with HFC bank on a credit card to the tune of £9838.

 

My monthly payments were 172 and suddenly, Weightmans wrote to me threatening me with a CCJ if I did not consent to a voluntary legal charge. They refused to accept my £172.

 

To cut a long story short, I did agree to the charge because at the time, I was under severe emotional stress - my Dad was dying from a terminal cancer, which Weightmans knew!

I have just received a letter saying that I can get a 50% reduction on the debt!

 

But: I cannot afford this right now even though there is a charge on my home.

What I have noticed is that Weightman's client is now Phoenix Recoveries UK LImited S.a.r.l.

 

Can I CCA Phoenix, or is it best to CCA Weightmans.

The card was staken out in 1998.

Also, if I DO CCA them, will they get frisky and threaten me with getting me to sell the house.

I do have aletter from them saying it was not their intention to do this which is why I agreed to the charge - stupid, I know.

 

Any advice greatly appreciated :)

xxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

A charging order nudges them further up the queue of creditors when it comes to being paid in the event your property is sold. In effect it turns an unsecured loan into a secured loan, but saying that they would still need a court order to force the sale of any property and given that you have made regular payments it would be extremely unlikely for them to succeed in any event.

 

I would be very suspicious of their 50% reduction of the alledged debt. If they have an enforceable agreement, regular payments from you and a 'Charging Order' they wouldn't need to make such a fantastic offer.

 

Requesting a CCA would be the way to go, just to see exactly what they have got in respect to a valid agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys.

One thing - I have not made any payments since 2007 which is when I signed the voluntary charge. I was not required to since Weightmans said it was to protect their client's interest.

 

42 man - you mentioned that I should be wary of Weightmans and stat demands. Do you recommend I do not rock the boadt by CCing them with a CCA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you.

Can't bear idea of losing my house over this???!

A charging order nudges them further up the queue of creditors when it comes to being paid in the event your property is sold. In effect it turns an unsecured loan into a secured loan, but saying that they would still need a court order to force the sale of any property and given that you have made regular payments it would be extremely unlikely for them to succeed in any event.

You won't lose your home.

 

Once you've determined whether there is an enforceable agreement in place or not you can decide what route to take. If it is unenforceable it is just that, they will not have any legal right to enforce payment & any charging order will be worthless. If it is enforceable you can then make an offer which is reasonably affordable to you, if they refuse & decide to apply for a CCJ a judge will look at your circumstances including any offer you have made. He and only he will decide what in his estimation you can reasonably afford to pay & that could be as little as £1 per month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi, no reply from Phoenix - 5 weeks!

 

Have signed POD.

Called Weightmans who said if Phoenix cannot supply CCA, then HFC - original creditor - would supply "reconstituted" copy!!!

Not acceptable methinks!

 

I told him the debt was unenforceable under Consumer Act, he disagreed.

 

Weightmans have a voluntary legal charge over my property over this "debt" - HFC credit card.

 

If they CCA cannot be supplied, can Weightmans legally still hold a legal charge over my property?

 

If not, what steps can I take to get it removed?

 

Thanks

x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 years later...

Dear all and happy New Year!

 

Lovely Mortimer Clarke Solicitors have just written to me (attached JPG).

 

In 2008, I agreed to a voluntary charge with Weightmans who steamrollered me into a voluntary charge upon my property.

It was a bad time as my dad was very sick and the cc card had been run up to help pay for treatment

(Weightmans were made aware but still continued threatening court action or a voluntary charge.

 

Now it seems that Marlin, who looks like they bought the original HFC cc debt have passed the account to these lovely people.

 

I have a couple of questions please:

 

1.) Do I have to pay to make payments as asked?

2.) Could I in any way challenge the original charge by CCAing Mortimers?

 

I know it's not a statute barred debt as it's a charge but the last payment made was in 2008 to this account.

 

I also consider that the letter is almost tantamount to harassment given the time of year and being asked to pay a huge debt within 14 days.

 

Does anybody have any advice or ideas please in response to my questions?

 

Thanks in advance!

mortimer.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 threads merged for history

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

is this a joint home and joint debt or just your home and your debt?

 

I can instruct my dog to sit

if it does is another matter.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I have just sent to a SAR to HFC Bank

 

I have received the following letter that confirms that no CCA exists whatsoever.

 

"A copy of the original credit card agreement is not enclosed as it is not held electronically or in a relevant manual filing system.

If it is held it will be in a manual format in a non relevant filing system (as defined  by the UK Data Privacy Laws).

HSBC is satisfied its search procedure meets the Information Commissioner's guidance."

 

Can MC force me to make payments or if they do not accept a lower offer of payment per month , will they find it easy to force the sale of my house with the VCO despite no CCA existing and evidence from Weightmans saying there was no intention to get me to sell the house.

hsbc no credit agreement - blanked-PDF.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

as stated numerous time here already, they cant force it's sale.

the charge is all but worthless now as they [was it Mortimer?] have confirmed no agreement exists.

without an enforceable agreement, its going nowhere.

 

and neither do you have to pay anything.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure thats quite correct DX

 

Have you actually looked a your deeds and checked the wording of this Charge and how it registered against your property ?

Just to confirm there has been no court involvement or judgment at all with regards to this debt...that you simply agreed to a voluntary legal charge to secure the debt to the creditor?

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to  The National Consumer Service  to help us to keep on helping you 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes I was just reading this:

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

Here is the wording on the title register:

"5 (****) Charge dated ***** in favour of HFC Bank Limited"

 

I think that there was a CCJ but it was set aside when I agreed to the VCO. Here's the thing _ I've looked through all the records sent to me by Weightmans and while they tell me that judgement was made, I never received any confirmation so it may have been a bluff.

 

I have attached the CH1 too.

 

Please let me know if there is anything else I can get to you.

 

Thanks so much for all your help everyone.

CH1 CAG.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...