Jump to content
We are now - The National Consumer Service ×


  • Tweets

    No tweets were found.

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Thanks
        • Like

Recommended Posts

My uncle had a home plumbing insurance policy.

Auto renewing for 4 years.

Annual premiums increased from £12 to £96 to £230 to £266.

He didn't need the policy as the cover was already being provided under his household policy.

 

I sent the firm a Subject Access Request

The bundle arrived and contained a copy of  the direct debit form.

It seems my uncle completed the mandate wrongly.

In the box for his Christian name, he put his full name.

In the box for his surname he wrote his signature.

In the box for his signature, he left blank.

I made a direct debit indemnity claim, stating the firm did not have a properly signed mandate.

The mandate should have been returned by the insurance company to be properly completed or rejected by the bank.

The bank repaid the debits for all 4 years by the time I put the phone down. 

 

Its WAR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi War 

 

What was the Plumbing Co involvd here.

 

Customers tend to set up policies or cover, etc, and then leave it. That's how insurers make a killing, when folk don't bother to compare quotes from other Co's.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The company was Homeserve.

 

Thames water sent Homeserve my (aged) uncle's details. Homeserve sent him a flyer offering him the £12 a year policy. He didn't understand it and  filled out the forms wrongly.

 

For four years Homeserve sent him a very wordy letter headed 'Relax, you are covered'. The text mentioned the new premium.

 

My uncle didn't realise  the £12 first year premium was an introductory offer designed to draw him in and that future years premiums would escalate by obscene amounts, and the annual 'Relax you are covered' letter highlighted that he needn't worry, he was covered and could relax.

 

The increase in premium was hidden away, especially for an old man who probably didn't have his reading glasses on. I doubt the 'Relax' letters even got read past the headline.

 

Homeserve are a complete rip off. Who in their right mind would pay an annual premium (higher than they could insure their whole house for), but only be covered for a dripping tap, blocked pipes etc?  As for damage caused by such a thing, his household policy already covered it. 

 

So, we will just wait and see how (or if) they try to defend the indemnity claim.

 

Edited by slick132
Spacing added to make post legible

Its WAR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi War,

 

Spacing added to your post above to make it easier to read. Please  use spacing and avoid solid text blocks.

 

Thames Water send out these "invitations" regularly, subjecting their customers to Homeserve's tactics. It's impossible to justify those increases, year on year.

 

Keep us posted on Homeserves reaction to the DD reclaim.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...